Back

Instantaneous Three-Dimensional Scanning for Foot Orthosis Design: Clinical Validation of a Multicamera Photogrammetry 3D Scanner

Taylor, J. A.; Terrill, A. J.; Wholohan, A.; Nightingale, R.; Nagle, O.; Pickering, E. I. M.; Holmes, D.; Powell, S. K.; Woodruff, M. A.

2026-05-20 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.13.26352176 medRxiv
Show abstract

3D scanners have revolutionised how podiatrists capture foot morphology in order to design custom orthoses (insoles). While various 3D scanning technologies are used in clinical practice, they vary greatly in cost and ease of use and many of these are not specifically designed for podiatry applications. There is limited literature comparing accuracy between scanners, and many approaches require prolonged scan times during which the patient must remain still. Multicamera photogrammetry offers a promising solution by enabling high-quality, rapid 3D scanning which other devices cannot provide. This study compared the accuracy and clinical utility of four 3D scanners. One was a high accuracy reference scanner (Artec Spider) which was used as a gold standard. Two further scanners which are commonly used in the clinic were also investigated (Apple iPad 6 with Structure Sensor attachment 'iPad', and Envisic VeriScan Podiatric Scanner 'laser') and these were directly compared with a novel prototype multicamera photogrammetry 3D scanner. The left feet of 20 healthy volunteers were scanned using each of the four devices and scans were evaluated for accuracy, completeness, and acquisition and processing times. All scanners produced clinically acceptable scans, with the novel photogrammetry scanner demonstrating superior accuracy. Scan times varied significantly between scanners, with the photogrammetry device capturing scans much faster. All scanners had acceptable levels of completeness, though the iPad and photogrammetry outperformed the laser scanner. These results provide a valuable tool for clinics seeking guidance on scanner selection and highlight the benefits of instantaneous photogrammetry scanning to improve workflow efficiency and accessibility.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.3%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
4
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
10
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%