Back

Wastewater and colloidal extracts of wastewater-irrigated soils select for resistant Acinetobacter baylyi beyond what measured antibiotic concentrations predict

Axtmann, K.; Paffenholz, C.; Auerhammer, A.; Michel-Farias, A.-K.; Heyde, B. J.; Coppers, L. M.; Braun, M.; Kappenberg, A.; Mulder, I.; Brueggen, S.; Siebe, C.; Amelung, W.; Siemens, J.; Bierbaum, G.

2026-05-13 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.12.724625 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Numerous studies have shown that the abundance of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARBs) or antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs) in soil increases after irrigation with wastewater. However, it is unclear whether this increase is due to the selection effects of pharmaceutical residues in the irrigation water or the continuous introduction of ARBs and ARGs with the wastewater. Further, it is unclear how the binding of antibiotics to natural colloids (1-1000 nm) affects their biological effects compared to truly dissolved substances (< 1 nm). We conducted competition experiments with resistant and susceptible Acinetobacter baylyi BD413 strains in wastewater, as well as in colloidal and truly dissolved extracts of soils irrigated with wastewater. Although the concentrations of our six target antibiotics were far below the measured minimum selective concentrations of the tested strains, we demonstrate that the resistant strain was favored in the wastewater and the colloidal extracts. In contrast, the truly dissolved fractions exhibited weaker and more variable selective effects. A non-targeted analysis revealed the presence of 82 additional substances in our extracts, including further antibiotics, pesticides, and different non-antibiotic drugs that may influence the selection of our resistant A. baylyi BD413 strain. Our findings suggest that antibiotic resistance is selected for in wastewater and wastewater-irrigated soils. This cannot be explained by antibiotic concentrations alone, but may also arise from the effects of complex mixtures of co-occurring contaminants, particularly those associated with colloidal particles.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.8%
2
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.1%
4
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
11
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
12
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
13
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
15
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
16
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
18
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
20
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%