Back

Extremely low effective population size in a captive-bred population: partial mitigation through management practices

Lamarins, A.; Waples, R. S.; Piironen, J.; Primmer, C. R.

2026-05-12 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.12.724519 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Effective population size (Ne) is a critical parameter for evaluating the evolutionary and persistence potential of endangered populations and for designing sustainable conservation strategies. Captive breeding and release programs are widely used across taxa to reduce risk of extinction when natural reproduction is insufficient or no longer possible, making it essential to assess their consequences. We used the case study of the landlocked Saimaa salmon (Salmo salar), one of the most critically en-dangered salmonid populations in Europe, with unique evolutionary significance due to its isolation from other populations since the last glaciation. Using long-term demographic data (1969-2024) from wild-caught founders of a captive breeding and release program, we estimated the effective population size under multiple scenarios of variance in reproductive success. Across scenarios, Ne ranged from 33 to 81 individuals, representing 32%-75% of the census size. Captive breeding practices aimed at equalizing parental contributions during fertilization and early life stages increased Ne by 12% compared to natural reproductive conditions. However, variation in survival after early developmental stages, typically beyond direct management control, remained a key determinant of Ne. Despite recent increases in the number of founders, the population remains genetically vulnerable due to historical bottlenecks. These results highlight that while captive breeding programs can partially mitigate genetic risks, their effectiveness depends critically on both controlled and uncontrolled sources of variance in reproductive success. Strengthening such programs may require combining breeding management with habitat restoration and, where appropriate, genetic rescue to ensure the long-term evolutionary potential of such unique and endangered populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
10
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
12
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
18
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
23
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
27
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%