Back

Development of a Xylene-Free Sample Preparation Protocol for Quantitative Proteomics of Clinically Relevant Formaldehyde-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Needle Biopsy Samples

Moagi, M.; Beke, L.; Mehes, G.; Kecskemeti, G.; Szabo, Z.; Turiak, L.; Csosz, E.

2026-05-14 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.05.12.724492 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fresh-frozen tissues are considered the gold standard for proteomic analyses due to superior preservation of protein integrity; however, their use is limited by the logistical and financial requirements of long-term storage. Formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues provide a practical alternative owing to their stability and widespread availability in clinical settings. A critical step in FFPE proteomics is deparaffinization, which traditionally relies on organic solvents such as xylene, along with efficient reversal of formaldehyde-induced crosslinks. In this study, we evaluated multiple FFPE protein extraction and digestion workflows including chaotropic, surfactant-based, and detergent-free approaches in combination with xylene-free deparaffinization strategies, using label-free data-independent acquisition (DIA) LC-MS/MS. Among the tested methods, a chaotropic-, reductant-, and surfactant-free in-solution digestion workflow demonstrated robust protein and peptide recovery. A modified version of this protocol further improved peptide coverage while maintaining comparable protein depth. The applicability of the optimized workflow was assessed using FFPE needle biopsy samples from control, hepatic steatosis, and liver fibrosis groups. Distinct proteomic patterns were observed across conditions, with hepatic steatosis associated with early activation of stress-response pathways, while fibrosis showed evidence suggesting altered lipid metabolism. Overall, this study presents a simple, xylene-free, and MS-compatible workflow for FFPE proteomics that is suitable for low-input clinical samples and may support broader application of archival tissues in proteomic research.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.8%
2
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.5%
3
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
5
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
11
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
14
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
24
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
25
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%