A computational decision-support approach for personalised care in youth mental health: A pilot feasibility study protocol
Iorfino, F.; Turner, A.; Varidel, M.; de Haan, Z.; Roberts, A. E.; Zhang, T.; An, V.; Huntley, S.; Marchant, R.; Crouse, J. J.; Cripps, S.; Barakat, S.; Maguire, S.; Oliver, D.; Scott, E. M.; Thornton, L.; Robinson, J.; LaMonica, H. M.; Hickie, I. B.
Show abstract
Introduction: Youth mental health presentations are largely heterogenous, making it difficult to match individuals to the most appropriate interventions. Personalised, measurement-based care has the potential to improve clinical decision-making and support shared decision-making, but remains challenging to implement in routine practice. Advances in digital monitoring and causal modelling offer new opportunities to identify individual-level processes driving mental health difficulties and to generate personalised decision-support. This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Minding Your Mind computational decision-support approach, a newly developed approach integrating routine outcome monitoring, individual-level causal modelling, and personalised feedback to support shared decision-making between young people and their clinicians. Methods and analysis: The study involves two phases. Phase 1 will recruit young people aged 15-25 years and mental health clinicians to participate in workshops to co-design the decision-support approach and its implementation into routine practice. Phase 2 is a prospective, single-arm feasibility study involving young people receiving mental health care and their treating clinicians. Primary outcomes include feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and usability of the decision-support approach, assessed via self-report and objective process indicators. Secondary outcomes include changes in use and experiences with shared decision-making, and clinical and functional outcomes. Quantitative analyses will be primarily descriptive, with exploratory pre-post comparisons and sensitivity analyses. Qualitative interviews will explore user experiences and implementation barriers and facilitators. Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Sydney Local Health District (RPAH Zone) Human Research Ethics Committee (X25-0341). All participants will provide informed consent prior to participation. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and accessible summaries co-developed with young people with lived experience.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Co-production of an online research and resource platform for improving the health of young people - The HYPE Project 96%
- Trialling an Optimised social Groups intervention in services to Enhance social connecTedness and mental Health in vulnERable young people (TOGETHER): Study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial 96%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital delivery of Behavioural Activation therapy to overcome depression and facilitate social and economic transitions of adolescents in South Africa (the DoBAt study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial 97%
- A Mobile App for Prolonged Grief among Bereaved Parents: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Common Practices for Sociodemographic Data Reporting in Digital Mental Health Intervention Research: A Scoping Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 95%
- Transdiagnostic phenotyping of psychopathology in a help-seeking population (PhenoNetz) - a study protocol for an experience sampling study 94%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote working in mental health services: a rapid umbrella review of pre-COVID-19 literature 95%
- Towards Participatory Precision Health: Systematic Review and Co-designed Guidelines For Adolescent Just-in-time Adaptive Interventions 94%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The development of a World Health Organization transdiagnostic chatbot intervention for distressed adolescents and young adults 95%
- Precision Digital Intervention for Depression Based on Social Rhythm Principles Adds Significantly to Outpatient Treatment 93%
- Leveraging Telemedicine To Improve Mnch Uptake In Kenya: A Community- Based Hybrid Model 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.