Back

A computational decision-support approach for personalised care in youth mental health: A pilot feasibility study protocol

Iorfino, F.; Turner, A.; Varidel, M.; de Haan, Z.; Roberts, A. E.; Zhang, T.; An, V.; Huntley, S.; Marchant, R.; Crouse, J. J.; Cripps, S.; Barakat, S.; Maguire, S.; Oliver, D.; Scott, E. M.; Thornton, L.; Robinson, J.; LaMonica, H. M.; Hickie, I. B.

2026-05-15 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.05.12.26353058 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Youth mental health presentations are largely heterogenous, making it difficult to match individuals to the most appropriate interventions. Personalised, measurement-based care has the potential to improve clinical decision-making and support shared decision-making, but remains challenging to implement in routine practice. Advances in digital monitoring and causal modelling offer new opportunities to identify individual-level processes driving mental health difficulties and to generate personalised decision-support. This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Minding Your Mind computational decision-support approach, a newly developed approach integrating routine outcome monitoring, individual-level causal modelling, and personalised feedback to support shared decision-making between young people and their clinicians. Methods and analysis: The study involves two phases. Phase 1 will recruit young people aged 15-25 years and mental health clinicians to participate in workshops to co-design the decision-support approach and its implementation into routine practice. Phase 2 is a prospective, single-arm feasibility study involving young people receiving mental health care and their treating clinicians. Primary outcomes include feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and usability of the decision-support approach, assessed via self-report and objective process indicators. Secondary outcomes include changes in use and experiences with shared decision-making, and clinical and functional outcomes. Quantitative analyses will be primarily descriptive, with exploratory pre-post comparisons and sensitivity analyses. Qualitative interviews will explore user experiences and implementation barriers and facilitators. Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Sydney Local Health District (RPAH Zone) Human Research Ethics Committee (X25-0341). All participants will provide informed consent prior to participation. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and accessible summaries co-developed with young people with lived experience.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.2%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
10
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
11
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
13
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
14
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%