Back

Reliable Uncertainty Under Class Imbalance and Distribution Shift: Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction of Multiple Sclerosis

Millar, A. S.; Roman, C.; Gouripeddi, R.; Facelli, J. C.

2026-05-15 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.12.26353057 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives To evaluate whether class-conditional conformal prediction (CP) can provide reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) under severe class imbalance and distribution shift, using multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a clinical exemplar. Methods We evaluated marginal and class-conditional CP using 720 T2-weighted MRI scans (142 MS, 578 controls). A convolutional neural network trained on 3 T data was evaluated under distribution shift (1.5 T acquisitions and synthetic image degradations). Through 100 Monte Carlo experiments, we assessed coverage guarantees, class-specific performance, and relationships between calibration set size, coverage variance, and uncertainty. Results Marginal CP severely under-covered the minority MS class (16.9% mean coverage at 1.5 T vs. 95.2% for controls) despite valid population-level guarantees. Class-conditional CP dramatically improved MS coverage to 77.5% at 1.5 T and 85.8% at 3 T, significantly reducing severe undercoverage (<80%) frequency while maintaining >89% control coverage. Minority class coverage variance increased due to limited calibration samples, matching theoretical Beta-binomial predictions. CP maintained validity under distribution shift; prediction set sizes scaled monotonically with shift severity, yielding clinically interpretable UQ. Conclusions Class-conditional CP successfully mitigates systematic undercoverage of minority disease classes while maintaining validity under distribution shift. The approach offers a practical, model-agnostic solution for uncertainty quantification applicable across clinical AI systems, though increased coverage variance for less represented conditions reflects fundamental statistical constraints. By characterizing these variance trade-offs, this framework enables more reliable deployment of diagnostic AI in heterogeneous clinical environments across diverse medical domains where minority disease class detection is critical.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.