Self-Rated Health Inequalities Among Registered Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of UK Longitudinal Studies
Ball, W. P.; Kyle, R. G.; Atherton, I. M.
Show abstract
Background Health inequalities between occupational or social class groups are pervasive and persistent. Healthcare professionals have better health outcomes compared to the general population. Whether this is a result of healthcare education, favourable socio-demographic characteristics among professionals or other effects is not certain and the extent to which single healthcare occupational groups exhibit inequalities is unknown. We have described self-rated health and quantified geographic health inequalities among a single occupational group of Registered Nurses compared to the general population. Methods We analysed nationally representative samples from the 2011 UK Censuses across England, Wales and Scotland in the Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study and Scottish Longitudinal Study. Self-rated health and socio-demographic characteristics for the study population are described. Inequalities in health by area deprivation among Registered Nurses and the General Population are quantified. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between Nurse status and self-rated health, adjusting for socio-demographic variables. Results Among economically active, working age adults (n = 478,802), we identified 9,180 Registered Nurses resident in England, Wales and Scotland. 59% of Registered Nurses reported very good self-rated health, with only 1% reporting poor or very poor health. A smaller proportion of Registered Nurses reported less than good health than the General Population at every level of area deprivation and had smaller absolute (4.1 percentage points vs. 9.1) and relative (RR: 1.5 vs. 2.0) inequalities between residents in the most and least deprived areas. Registered Nurses have an increased likelihood of reporting good or better health compared to the general population (Scotland OR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2 - 1.5, England & Wales OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.3 - 1.5) after adjusting for socio-demographic factors. Discussion Registered Nurses report better health compared to the general population and have smaller inequalities in health by area deprivation. However, unfair and avoidable geographical differences in health are present even in this socioeconomically privileged professional group. After adjusting for socioeconomic and demographic factors, the positive association between being a Registered Nurse and having good self-rated health remained.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics of those most vulnerable to employment changes during the Covid-19 pandemic: a nationally representative cross-sectional study in Wales 95%
- Socioeconomic inequality in recent adverse mortality trends in Scotland. 94%
- Population-level changes in the mental health of UK workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study using Understanding Society 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the risk of endogeneity bias in health and mortality inequalities research using composite measures of multiple deprivation which include health-related indicators: A case study using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation and population health and mortality data 95%
- The association between socioeconomic status and mobility reductions in the early stage of England’s COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Continuing inequalities in COVID-19 mortality in England and Wales, and the changing importance of regional, over local, deprivation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 94%
- The association between work situation and life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: prospective cohort study in Norway 92%
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between area-level socioeconomic disadvantage and COVID-19 disease consequences in Sydney, Australia: A retrospective cohort analysis 94%
- The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia 93%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic minority groups in England and Wales - factors affecting the size and timing of elevated COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective cohort study linking Census and death records 91%
- Impacts of COVID-19 on sick leave 90%
- Education-related inequalities in cause-specific mortality: First estimates for Australia using individual-level linked census and mortality data 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.