Back

Rheumatic Heart Disease Detection in Asymptomatic Schoolchildren using ECG and PCG

Chuma, A. T.; Wang, C.; Voigt, J.-u.; Mekonnen, D.; Asmare, M. H.; Vanrumste, B.

2026-05-15 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.12.26352939 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major public health concern across low- and middle-income countries in the Global South. Early detection through community-based screening of asymptomatic individuals has been identified as a critical strategy for reducing the disease burden. Despite this, the absence of accessible, automated population screening tools continues to impede implementation at scale. This study investigates the screening potential of integrating electrocardiography (ECG) and phonocardiography (PCG) for the early detection of RHD in asymptomatic schoolchildren. The dataset was obtained as part of an ambulatory screening initiative conducted across multiple school sites in rural areas of Ethiopia. It comprised ECG and PCG recordings from 611 asymptomatic schoolchildren aged 10 to 20 years. A comprehensive set of time-frequency, visibility graph and non-linear features were extracted from both signal modalities. These features were subsequently evaluated using machine learning models to assess their utility in the automated screening of early RHD. The best model achieved an average 10-folds cross-validation scores on sensitivity, positive-predictive-value and F1-score of 59.6%, 63.6% and 60.8%, respectively for multimodal ECG and PCG signals. Whereas separate evaluation of ECG showed an F1-score of 61.1% and PCG achieved 23.5%. Key features included the T-wave, the area under the QRS complex, and entropy measures derived from beat visibility graphs in the ECG. In addition, visibility graph features from multi-band S1 and S2 heart sound segments, along with MFCC coefficients from the PCG, were also relevant. However, PCG alone performed poorly and did not show improved results over the ECG features. Although auscultation is key clinical diagnosis tool in symptomatic RHD, combined PCG with ECG features does not enhance asymptomatic RHD detection using the ECG modality alone.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.2%
4
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
7
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
12
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
14
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
15
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
21
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
28
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%