Back

CTCA-Based Pericoronary Fat and Anatomy-Flow Signatures Identify Future Culprit Lesions in Moderate Stenoses

Zhang, M.; Shen, C.; McGrath-Cadell, L.; Gharleghi, R.; Assareh, H.; Otton, J.; Moses, D. A.; Wentzel, J. J.; Graham, R. M.; McLachlan, C. S.; Beier, S.

2026-05-15 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.12.26352858 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: A substantial proportion of coronary events originate from angiographically moderate lesions, indicating that stenosis severity alone does not reflect lesion biomechanical risk. Objectives: To test whether adding lesion-adjacent pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) and CTCA-derived anatomy-flow descriptors to quantitative plaque assessment improves identification of future culprit lesions, with a prespecified focus on moderate stenosis. Methods: We performed a within-patient, lesion-level case-control analysis in the GeoCAD cohort, including patients undergoing coronary revascularisation during follow-up. Culprit lesions were identified from longitudinal CTCA. Stenosis severity, quantitative plaque composition, and PCAT volume were quantified (MEDIS), and vessel centreline geometry and lesion haemodynamics derived using computational modelling. Incremental prognostic value was assessed using Cox models with drop-one and stepwise workflow analyses, including a prespecified subgroup analysis of moderate stenosis lesions (25 - 49% diameter stenosis). Results: Among 46 patients (212 lesions; 55 culprit), percent area stenosis (%AS) dominated culprit lesion discrimination (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.54 - 2.62; p < 0.001). In 82 moderate-stenosis lesions (30 culprit), %AS provided minimal discrimination ({Delta}C-index: 0.01; p=0.895). Culprit lesions were characterised by greater PCAT volume (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.29 - 2.37; p < 0.001), higher helical flow intensity (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.16 - 1.57; p < 0.001), and lower torsion (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.84; p=0.009). Adding anatomy-flow descriptors improved risk stratification for moderate lesions beyond CTCA stenosis and plaque/PCAT features (p=0.007). Conclusions: In moderate stenosis, lesion-adjacent PCAT and anatomy-flow descriptors provided incremental prognostic information beyond luminal narrowing and plaque composition, supporting integrated CTCA phenotyping to identify high-risk nonobstructive coronary lesions.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.4%
3
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
5
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
8
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
10
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
16
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
22
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
26
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%