Back

Pre-admission polypharmacy burden and intensive care unit outcomes in patients with sepsis: A retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV-ED linked database

Haque, F.; Hasan, M.

2026-05-15 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.05.12.26352808 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Polypharmacy is highly prevalent among critically ill patients, yet it's independent impact on intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes in sepsis remains critically unexplored. We aimed to evaluate whether pre-admission polypharmacy independently predicts ICU mortality and provides incremental prognostic value using the medication reconciliation module of the MIMIC-IV-ED linked database. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 3,347 adults admitted to the ICU who met Sepsis-3 criteria. Pre-admission polypharmacy was categorized as none (0-4), standard (5-9), or high (>=10 medications). Multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, and reclassification analyses (NRI/IDI) were performed. The primary outcome was in-hospital ICU mortality. Results: High polypharmacy was present in 58.9% of patients. Crude ICU mortality increased sequentially: 18.5% (none), 26.0% (standard), and 27.5% (high; p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, high polypharmacy independently predicted in-hospital ICU mortality (aOR 1.45, 95% CI (1.10-1.91)), and 28-day mortality (aOR 1.47). Drug-class analysis identified statins as significantly protective (aOR 0.56), whereas RAS blockers combined with diuretics increased acute kidney injury risk (aOR 1.49). Propensity matching confirmed the primary mortality association (matched aOR 1.28). Conclusions: By utilizing the ED medication reconciliation table, this study proves high polypharmacy represents a distinct 'pharmacologic frailty', independent of acute severity. Available instantly at triage, this zero-latency metric provides significant early prognostic value (SOFA NRI = 0.24) and identifies actionable high-risk interactions (e.g., RAS blockers plus diuretics) for immediate, targeted pharmacist-led intervention upon ICU admission.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
3
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
8
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
10
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
15
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%