Back

Pre-admission polypharmacy burden and intensive care unit outcomes in patients with sepsis: A retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV-ED linked database

Haque, F.; Hasan, M.

2026-05-15 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.05.12.26352808 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Polypharmacy is highly prevalent among critically ill patients, yet it's independent impact on intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes in sepsis remains critically unexplored. We aimed to evaluate whether pre-admission polypharmacy independently predicts ICU mortality and provides incremental prognostic value using the medication reconciliation module of the MIMIC-IV-ED linked database. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 3,347 adults admitted to the ICU who met Sepsis-3 criteria. Pre-admission polypharmacy was categorized as none (0-4), standard (5-9), or high (>=10 medications). Multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, and reclassification analyses (NRI/IDI) were performed. The primary outcome was in-hospital ICU mortality. Results: High polypharmacy was present in 58.9% of patients. Crude ICU mortality increased sequentially: 18.5% (none), 26.0% (standard), and 27.5% (high; p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, high polypharmacy independently predicted in-hospital ICU mortality (aOR 1.45, 95% CI (1.10-1.91)), and 28-day mortality (aOR 1.47). Drug-class analysis identified statins as significantly protective (aOR 0.56), whereas RAS blockers combined with diuretics increased acute kidney injury risk (aOR 1.49). Propensity matching confirmed the primary mortality association (matched aOR 1.28). Conclusions: By utilizing the ED medication reconciliation table, this study proves high polypharmacy represents a distinct 'pharmacologic frailty', independent of acute severity. Available instantly at triage, this zero-latency metric provides significant early prognostic value (SOFA NRI = 0.24) and identifies actionable high-risk interactions (e.g., RAS blockers plus diuretics) for immediate, targeted pharmacist-led intervention upon ICU admission.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.2%
3
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Critical Care Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.5%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.1%
21
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
23
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%