Advancing diagnosis of bipolar disorder using brain morphometric similarity networks in a graph AI framework
Sampaio, I. W.; Poli, G.; Pigoni, A.; Bellani, M.; Benedetti, F.; Nenadic, I.; Philips, M. L.; Piras, F.; Soares, J. C.; Torrente, Y.; Yatham, L. N.; Bianchi, A. M.; Maggioni, E.; Brambilla, P.
Show abstract
Brain similarity networks (BSNs), extracted from structural magnetic resonance imaging, provide a validated framework for studying brain network organization and encode neurodevelopmental information relevant for psychiatric disorders. Recently, a neurodevelopmental hypothesis has been proposed for bipolar disorder (BD), where evidence demonstrates neuroprogression phenotypes differing from controls. BSNs offer a promising framework for investigating BD's neural correlates but remain largely underexplored. Parallelly, graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as suitable deep learning models for exploiting network-level information. This study aimed to investigate BSNs for discriminating subjects with BD from controls within a GNN framework using the multi-site StratiBip network, composed of 605 controls and 501 subjects with BD. Leveraging advanced analysis tools, we developed a multi-site classification framework including: i) the state-of-the-art MIND algorithm for computing morphometric similarity (MS) networks based on gray matter volumes (GMV), ii) MS integration with age, sex, and GMV, iii) a leave-one-site-out cross-validation for multi-site model generalizability evaluation. The best model achieved a mean multi-site accuracy of 68%. Explainability analyses revealed meaningful MS patterns in the basal ganglia, frontal and temporal lobes, and a particularly relevant integration with age. This study provides interpretable insights into the role of MS in BD and unveils evidence supporting ageing-related processes as a significant component of BD pathophysiology.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bridging Structural MRI with Cognitive Function for Individual Level Classification of Early Psychosis via Deep Learning 95%
- Explaining Deep Learning-Based Representations of Resting State Functional Connectivity Data: Focusing on Interpreting Nonlinear Patterns in Autism Spectrum Disorder 94%
- Towards Biophysical Markers of Depression Vulnerability 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting sex, age, general cognition and mental health with machine learning on brain structural connectomes 95%
- WMH-DualTasker: A weakly-supervised deep learning model for automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation and visual rating prediction 94%
- Big Data, Small Bias: Harmonizing Diffusion MRI-Based Structural Connectomes to Mitigate Site-Related Bias in Data Integration 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stable Biomarker Identification For Predicting Schizophrenia in the Human Connectome 95%
- Estimated connectivity networks outperform observed connectivity networks when classifying people with multiple sclerosis into disability groups 94%
- Characterising grey-white matter relationships in recent-onset psychosis and its association with cognitive function 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain age prediction reveals aberrant brain white matter in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A multi-sample diffusion tensor imaging study 94%
- Default Mode Network Hypoalignment of Function to Structure Correlates with Depression and Rumination 93%
- Addressing Inaccurate Nosology in Mental Health: A Multi Label Data Cleansing Approach for Detecting Label Noise from Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data in Mood and Psychosis Disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Atlas-independent brain connectome analysis at voxel-level granularity: graph convolutional networks for etiology classification in newborns 95%
- Goal-specific brain MRI harmonization 95%
- How to measure functional connectivity using resting-state fMRI? A comprehensive empirical exploration of different connectivity metrics 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.