Back

Functional T cells trapped behind a stromal wall: a Brake-with-Wall phenotype redefines pancreatic adenocarcinoma immunotherapy resistance

Yong, J.

2026-05-14 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.11.724216 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the paradigmatic immunotherapy-refractory cancer, with a 5-year survival of approximately 12% and minimal benefit from immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). The dominant mechanistic explanation classifies PDAC as a T cell-excluded "cold" tumor, implying that no functional anti-tumor T cells are available for checkpoint release. Whether this Block-strategy view is correct has not been re-examined under integrated evasion-framework analysis. MethodsWe applied a previously developed 16-module immune evasion framework to TCGA-PAAD (n=183), integrated with hub-cytokine analysis (IL-10/TGF-{beta}), Kv1.3-immune channelome data, and clinical trial mapping (12,007 trials). Single-cell validation used two independent PDAC cohorts retrieved through TISCH2: PAAD_CRA001160 (Peng 2019, 35 samples [24 PDAC + 11 adjacent normal], 57,443 cells) and PAAD_GSE154778 (Lin 2020, 16 samples, 14,953 cells), examined for CD8A, TOX, PRF1, KCNA3, and FAP expression by cell type. ResultsPDAC scored highest in CAF Wall (z=0.768) and Platelet Cloak (z=0.663) modules; strategy classification yielded Brake -- not Block -- driven by a positive KCNA3-survival relationship (HR=0.649, 95% CI 0.43-0.97, p=0.037). Single-cell qualitative analysis of TISCH2 violin plots showed that CD8 exhausted T cells (CD8Tex) carried (i) high CD8A, (ii) the highest TOX expression among annotated cell types, (iii) preserved PRF1, and (iv) high KCNA3 expression. FAP was strongly localized to fibroblasts (peak [~]3.0 vs. <0.5 elsewhere). The pattern was reproduced in the second cohort. The optimal three-module attack (MHC restoration + CAF disruption + VEGF blockade) suppressed 10 of 16 evasion modules in silico (62.5%); zero of 370 PDAC immunotherapy trials test this combination. ConclusionsPDAC may not be T cell-cold but T cell-trapped: CD8 T cells with intact Kv1.3 channels appear immobilized behind a FAP-positive cancer-associated fibroblast wall. ICB monotherapy is mechanistically insufficient because the brake is engaged on T cells that cannot reach the tumor. The framework predicts that triple-targeted intervention -- checkpoint release + CAF wall disruption + vascular normalization -- is the minimum effective strategy. This is a hypothesis-generating computational analysis; prospective experimental and clinical validation are required.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
48.8%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
4
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
5
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
7
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
8
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
9
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
18
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
19
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
21
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%