Back

Fiber dispersion in the right ventricle: A comparison of constitutive neural network predictions with experimental data

Ingalkar, P.; Kakaletsis, S.; Rausch, M.; Kuhl, E.; Martonova, D.

2026-05-14 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.11.724139 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mechanical behavior of right ventricular (RV) myocardium is governed by its anisotropic microstructure, yet constitutive models that account for fiber dispersion and enable reliable parameter identification remain limited. In this study, we propose a physics-embedded constitutive neural network framework for automated discovery of strain energy functions and microstructural parameters from experimental data. The model is formulated within an incompressible, orthotropic hyperelastic setting using invariant-based representations. Fiber, sheet, and normal directions are incorporated through a rotated structural basis, and dispersion effects are modeled using a generalized structure tensor approach. The framework is trained on multi-axial mechanical data from ovine RV myocardium, including uniaxial tension-compression and simple shear tests. We investigate two training scenarios: (i) full datasets containing both tensile and compressive regimes and (ii) datasets restricted to tensile loading. In both cases, the model accurately reproduces the measured stress-strain responses and identifies sparse, interpretable constitutive models which involve isotropic, anisotropic, and coupling invariants. However, the identifiability of microstructural parameters strongly depends on the available loading conditions. While tensile-only data yield higher predictive accuracy, they result in non-unique or biased estimates of fiber dispersion. In contrast, inclusion of compressive data enables consistent identification of dispersion parameters by separating fiber and matrix contributions. These results highlight the importance of multi-axial loading data for robust parameter identification and demonstrate the capability of constitutive neural network-based approaches for data-driven modeling of anisotropic soft tissues.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.7%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
6
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
8
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
11
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
14
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%