Back

Design and methodology of a randomized clinical trial of prolonged daily antibiotic suppression with and without fulguration for uncomplicated recurrent urinary tract infections in women

Zimmern, P. E.; Souders, C.; Prokesch, B. C.; Lutz, K.; De Nisco, N. J.

2026-05-14 urology
10.64898/2026.05.11.26352945 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveRecurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) significantly decrease quality of life and antibiotics are becoming increasingly less effective due to antimicrobial resistance. Alternative effective treatment strategies are urgently needed for rUTIs. Prior studies have indicated that women can experience resolved or improved rUTI following electrofulguration (EF). To further investigate these findings, we report on the design and methodology behind a randomized trial examining two treatment arms: standard prolonged antibiotic treatment with nitrofurantoin (NF) alone or in combination with EF. Patients and MethodsThe aim of this randomized trial is to determine, at two institutions, the efficacy of two interventions for rUTI associated with early stages of chronic cystitis (stages 1 and 2): conventional 6 months low-dose (100mg) NF daily antibiotic suppression alone (NF) or conventional NF with EF (EF + NF). The study is also designed to analyze changes in the urinary microbiomes in the two different treatment arms and to determine the durability of clinical outcomes in both treatment arms at 2 years after the end of each intervention. The primary outcomes will be obtained from 6 to 18 months, as well as 18 - 30 months following completion of the original 6-month intervention. Failure is defined based on UTI symptoms documented by a validated questionnaire with a documented urine culture confirming a bacterial strain at each UTI episode following the end of the 6-month intervention. ConclusionsThis randomized trial is designed to examine the efficacy and durability of treating women with rUTIs using the standard of care of NF alone, or an EF procedure with NF.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.2%
2
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
7
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.1%
8
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
10
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%