Back

Targeted Tuberculosis (TB) Vaccination Strategies in the United States: A Modeling Study

Rothman, J.; Castro, K. G.; Lopman, B.; Gandhi, N. R.; Nelson, K.

2026-05-14 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.11.26352914 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTuberculosis (TB) incidence in the United States has remained elevated above pre-pandemic levels since 2021, with over 85% of cases resulting from reactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection. New vaccines that would prevent TB in adults are under development, but the potential health impact of a program prioritizing non-U.S.-born persons and persons with medical comorbidities, including persons living with HIV (PLWH), has not been evaluated. MethodsWe developed a deterministic compartmental transmission model that simulates Mtb infection, transmission, and progression to TB in the U.S., both in the general population and in key high-risk groups. We calibrated the model to 2024 U.S. TB surveillance data and estimated annual cases prevented, percent reduction in annual TB cases, and number needed to vaccinate (NNV, a measure of vaccine program efficiency) at equilibrium conditions for targeted vaccination strategies under optimistic and plausible scenarios, varying assumptions of vaccine efficacy, duration of protection, and achieved vaccination coverage in high-risk groups. FindingsUnder an optimistic scenario, vaccinating PLWH, non-U.S.-born persons, and persons with medical comorbidities (all high-risk groups) prevented 5,385 cases per year (51{middle dot}8% reduction, NNV = 366). Under a more conservative plausible scenario, the same strategy prevented 1,348 cases per year (13{middle dot}0% reduction, NNV = 510). The efficiency and impact of targeting strategies we considered were preserved across all sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. InterpretationTargeted vaccination of persons with Mtb infection in population subgroups recognized to be at high-risk for TB can reduce incidence substantially. Strategies that include non- U.S.-born persons and PLWH are most efficient and impactful. FundingAmerican Lung Association, U.S. National Institutes of Health, and the Ferguson Fellowship.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
5
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
9
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
12
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.7%
28
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%