Targeted Tuberculosis (TB) Vaccination Strategies in the United States: A Modeling Study
Rothman, J.; Castro, K. G.; Lopman, B.; Gandhi, N. R.; Nelson, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundTuberculosis (TB) incidence in the United States has remained elevated above pre-pandemic levels since 2021, with over 85% of cases resulting from reactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection. New vaccines that would prevent TB in adults are under development, but the potential health impact of a program prioritizing non-U.S.-born persons and persons with medical comorbidities, including persons living with HIV (PLWH), has not been evaluated. MethodsWe developed a deterministic compartmental transmission model that simulates Mtb infection, transmission, and progression to TB in the U.S., both in the general population and in key high-risk groups. We calibrated the model to 2024 U.S. TB surveillance data and estimated annual cases prevented, percent reduction in annual TB cases, and number needed to vaccinate (NNV, a measure of vaccine program efficiency) at equilibrium conditions for targeted vaccination strategies under optimistic and plausible scenarios, varying assumptions of vaccine efficacy, duration of protection, and achieved vaccination coverage in high-risk groups. FindingsUnder an optimistic scenario, vaccinating PLWH, non-U.S.-born persons, and persons with medical comorbidities (all high-risk groups) prevented 5,385 cases per year (51{middle dot}8% reduction, NNV = 366). Under a more conservative plausible scenario, the same strategy prevented 1,348 cases per year (13{middle dot}0% reduction, NNV = 510). The efficiency and impact of targeting strategies we considered were preserved across all sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. InterpretationTargeted vaccination of persons with Mtb infection in population subgroups recognized to be at high-risk for TB can reduce incidence substantially. Strategies that include non- U.S.-born persons and PLWH are most efficient and impactful. FundingAmerican Lung Association, U.S. National Institutes of Health, and the Ferguson Fellowship.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the potential impact and diagnostic requirements for SARS-CoV-2 test-and-treat programs 95%
- Maternal pertussis immunization and the blunting of routine vaccine effectiveness: A meta-analysis and modeling study 95%
- Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in South Africa 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of screening with transcriptional signatures for incipient TB among U.S. migrants 97%
- The potential impact of novel tuberculosis vaccine introduction on economic growth in low- and middle-income countries 95%
- Long term vaccination strategies to mitigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a modelling study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on TB outcomes in the United States: a Bayesian analysis 94%
- Burden of lower respiratory tract infections preventable by adult immunization with 15- and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in the United States 93%
- Population immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in US states and counties due to infection and vaccination, January 2020-November 2021 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in South Africa and epidemiological characteristics of the Omicron variant 94%
- Estimating the contribution of subclinical tuberculosis disease to transmission – an individual patient data analysis from prevalence surveys 92%
- Deep-sequence phylogenetics to quantify patterns of HIV transmission in the context of a universal testing and treatment trial – BCPP/ Ya Tsie trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.