Back

Video-based Detection of Delirium in Hospitalized Adults

Mendu, M.; Tesh, R. A.; Pellerin, K.; Steward, G. E.; Cerda, I. H.; Williams, M.; Colman, M.; Shah, S.; Lam, A. D.; Cash, S. S.; Westover, M. B.; Kimchi, E. Y.

2026-05-13 geriatric medicine
10.64898/2026.05.11.26352902 medRxiv
Show abstract

Delirium, a dynamic neuropsychiatric condition associated with morbidity and mortality, remains underdiagnosed due to reliance on subjective, intermittent screening tools. Objective and potentially continuous identification is needed to improve clinical care. We developed and validated an analytic framework for delirium classification based on automatically extracted video features. In this prospective cohort study, patients ([≥] 18 years) admitted to the inpatient medical or neurological ward of a tertiary academic center between August 2020 and March 2022 with an expected stay longer than one night were enrolled. Daily structured delirium assessments and brief video recordings were performed in consenting patients. Videos were analyzed using deep learning pose estimation to extract keypoints and calculate behavioral features based on eye, face, and limb postures and movements. Four machine learning models (logistic regression, gradient boosting, support vector machines, and random forests) were trained to predict delirium status from extracted features. Model performance was evaluated on 20 repetitions of three-fold cross-validation using the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC ROC). The cohort included 109 videos from 25 male and 25 female participants (median age: 72, IQR: 63.25-78). Twenty videos (18%) were from patients with delirium. Keypoints for this dataset were more accurately extracted using a customized ResNet-101 model developed with DeepLabCut (sensitivity 0.94, specificity 0.89, compared to human-labeled gold standards) than using off-the-shelf models. Keypoints were then used to generate behavioral features summarizing movement and postures throughout the video. A support vector machine model achieved an average delirium classification AUC ROC of 0.79 (SD {+/-} 0.09), sensitivity of 0.71 (SD {+/-} 0.16), and specificity of 0.78 (SD {+/-} 0.07). This study demonstrates the feasibility of identifying delirium using brief videos in clinically heterogeneous cohorts and reveals novel features for objective identification. Author SummaryDelirium is a sudden change in attention and awareness that commonly affects hospitalized patients. It is linked with longer hospital stays, cognitive decline, and death. Patients with delirium often show changes in movements and behaviors such as slowed movement, restlessness, or excessive scanning of the environment. Since current screening tools rely on intermittent human interactions, they can be subjective and miss the fluctuating nature of delirium, leading to underdiagnosis. We sought to explore whether short video recordings could be used to detect delirium automatically. In our study, we enrolled 50 hospitalized patients and conducted daily delirium assessments and video recordings. We used a machine learning model to analyze patients eye movements, facial expressions, and body postures. We found that video-derived features could be used to identify delirium in a small clinical cohort. While needing further validation in outside cohorts, this study shows an important proof-of-concept for objective delirium monitoring in heterogeneous clinical contexts without adding burden to clinical staff.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.6%
3
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
7
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
8
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
11
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
12
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
16
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
30
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%