Three-dimensional printing of lifelike PET phantoms

BackgroundRealistic PET/CT phantoms are essential for system evaluation, protocol optimization, and validation of advanced reconstruction methods. However, existing phantoms are often limited by simplified geometries, spatially uniform activity patterns, and complex preparation procedures. PurposeTo develop and evaluate PixelPrintPET, a 3D printing-based method for fabricating anatomically realistic PET/CT phantoms with spatially heterogeneous radiotracer distributions and a single-solution filling workflow that avoids physical compartmentalization. MethodsPixelPrintPET generates voxel-based printing instructions that encode spatially varying infill, which is realized during printing through modulation of filament extrusion, enabling heterogeneous activity distributions without compartmentalization of radioactivity at different activity concentrations. Calibration phantoms and anatomically structured phantoms were designed and printed using high-flow polylactic acid (PLA), with anatomical inputs derived from either digital atlas-based models or patient imaging data. The printed phantoms were subsequently filled by immersion in a radioactive solution, allowing activity distribution to be controlled by the internal porous structure. A bottom-up filling procedure with reduced surface tension was developed to ensure uniform infiltration and minimize air entrapment. Phantoms were imaged on the PennPET Explorer PET/CT system, and quantitative performance was evaluated using contrast recovery coefficient (CRC), target-to-background ratio (TBR), and comparisons with simulated or patient-derived reference data. ResultsA strong linear relationship between infill ratio and normalized signal (R2 = 0.998) was demonstrated by the calibration phantom, enabling reliable mapping between structure and activity. Additionally, air entrapment was minimized to less than 1% of the total phantom volume. In the contrast recovery phantom, CRC values were consistent with measurements using traditional phantoms. The brain phantom reproduced atlas-derived contrast patterns, with gray-to-white matter differences within 5% after accounting for resolution and other system effects. The patient-based thorax phantom showed high reproducibility across repeated scans, with differences within 3%, and closely matched the input patient image with regional differences within 10% in all regions except the lung. ConclusionsPixelPrintPET enables the fabrication of realistic, reproducible, and versatile PET/CT phantoms with a voxel-level control of the activity distribution. This approach provides a practical solution for generating patient-specific and application-specific phantoms, with the potential to accelerate system validation, protocol development, and clinical translation of advanced PET/CT technologies.