Back

SIGNAL: A Scalable, Real-World Model for Rapid Intraoperative Molecular Classification of Gliomas Using Stimulated Raman Histology

Goff, N. K.; Markert, J. E.; Reinecke, D.; Springer, A.; Chen, A. M.; Park, M.; Malte, G.; Scotford-Broemmer, K.; Hoonsbeen, S.; Eddy, K.; Chowdury, A.; Jiang, C.; Kondepudi, A.; Meissner, A.-K.; Fürtjes, G.; Müller, N.; Neuschmelting, V.; Pekmezci, M.; Young, J.; Freudinger, C.; Snuderl, M.; Berger, M.; Hervey-Jumper, S.; Golfinos, J. G.; Hollon, T.; Orringer, D. A.

2026-05-13 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.11.26350247 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrevious machine learning models to intraoperatively predict the molecular status of gliomas using stimulated Raman histology (SRH), such as DeepGlioma, have achieved high performance (91.5% accuracy) on curated datasets. However, when used intraoperatively, DeepGlioma (162M parameters) runs slowly on current SRH hardware and underperforms due to its lack of an image rejection mechanism and its validation on curated images. Here, we introduce SRH-Informed Glioma classificatioN with Attention Learning (SIGNAL) (27M parameters), a lighter model with a built-in attention-based rejection mechanism that outperforms DeepGlioma on uncurated clinical datasets. MethodsSIGNAL was developed using 1.56 million SRH fields-of-view from 967 adult diffuse glioma patients collected between December 2017 and July 2025. We used 412 patients from NYU for training and internal validation and a multi-institutional, international cohort of 555 patients for testing. SIGNAL uses a ResNet50 backbone pretrained using a hierarchical contrastive loss function followed by a multi-head multi-layer perceptron (MLP). Using a patch-based attention threshold of 0.6, a final MLP was trained to predict glioma subtypes: glioblastoma, oligodendroglioma, or astrocytoma. ResultsSIGNAL outperformed DeepGlioma, achieving greater overall accuracy (90.10% vs. 72.59%) while running faster (16.0 vs. 6.7 patches/s). SIGNAL also outperformed DeepGlioma on all three molecular classification tasks, including IDH mutation (accuracy: 93.51% vs. 79.22%), 1p19q codeletion (93.51% vs. 88.31%), and ATRX loss (89.61% vs. 83.98%). SIGNALs attention mechanism had a strong positive linear correlation with mean patch cellularity (r=0.96, p<0.001) and a strong negative correlation with patch blood coverage (r=-0.99,p<0.001). Finally, subtype and molecular accuracy between tumor core and margin samples were equivalent despite significantly lower patch retention in tumor margins (44.5% vs 60.2%, p<0.0001). ConclusionSIGNAL is a lightweight model for intraoperative molecular classification of gliomas using SRH imaging. Its attention-based image quality filter allows for excellent performance, quick processing, and highly interpretable outputs critical for reliable use in intraoperative workflows. Brief 1-2 Sentence DescriptionWe present SIGNAL, a lightweight machine learning model for intraoperative molecular classification of diffuse gliomas using stimulated Raman histology, whose core innovation is a learned attention mechanism that filters diagnostically uninformative tissue, such as blood and acellular regions, before classification, enabling robust real-world generalizability. Validated on 555 patients across four international centers, SIGNAL outperforms the previous state-of-the-art model DeepGlioma on glioma subtype classification (90.10% vs. 72.59% accuracy) while running 2.4 times faster on intraoperative hardware.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.1%
2
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.8%
5
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.9%
23
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
27
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%