Back

Characterizing in vivo degradation of electrospun biodegradable nanofibers by size-exclusion chromatography

Kunioka, S.; Yoshida, T.; Naruse, D.; Setogawa, Y.; Miyamoto, H.; Ushioda, R.; Kikuchi, Y.; Tsutsui, M.; Kamiya, H.; Oyama, K.

2026-05-13 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.10.724172 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biodegradable electrospun nanofiber (NF) scaffolds have emerged as promising materials for tissue engineering applications, including vascular grafts, because their mechanical properties and degradability can be tuned. However, their in vivo degradation behavior remains poorly understood. In this study, we characterized the in vivo degradation profiles of representative biodegradable NF materials widely used in small-caliber vascular graft research, namely polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(D,L-lactide) (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), and a PCL/PLA blend, by monitoring molecular weight changes in subcutaneous and vascular environments. Electrospun NF sheets were implanted subcutaneously in mice, and tubular NF grafts were implanted into the abdominal aorta of rats. Samples were harvested for up to 48 weeks after implantation and analyzed primarily by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) to assess time-dependent changes in molecular weight. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were additionally performed to evaluate ultrastructural and chemical changes associated with degradation. SEC analysis revealed distinct material-specific degradation patterns. PCL showed the slowest degradation and retained a relatively high weight-average molecular weight (Mw) in both environments. PLA exhibited marked environment dependence, with near-complete degradation in the subcutaneous environment by 48 weeks, whereas scaffold structure was maintained in the vascular environment. The PCL/PLA blend showed earlier reduction in the high-molecular-weight fraction than PCL, indicating faster scaffold breakdown. PGA degraded most rapidly and could not be evaluated beyond 2 weeks in the subcutaneous model or in the vascular model because of early graft rupture. SEM analysis further demonstrated that progressive loss of fibrous ultrastructure over time was a common feature across all materials. In addition, NF scaffolds became resistant to organic solvent after implantation in vivo, and solid-state 13C NMR analysis of the solvent-insoluble fractions detected polymer-derived signals together with additional signals consistent with biological constituents. These findings indicate that in vivo degradation of biodegradable NF scaffolds is material dependent, environment dependent, and more complex than simple hydrolytic chain cleavage alone. This study provides a quantitative framework for evaluating NF degradability and offers new insight into the design of biodegradable vascular grafts. HighlightsO_LISEC quantified long-term in vivo degradation of PCL, PLA, PGA, and PCL/PLA. C_LIO_LIDegradation was both material dependent and implantation environment dependent. C_LIO_LIIn vivo nanofiber degradation involved structural and chemical changes beyond hydrolysis. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
5
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
8
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
11
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
19
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.7%
24
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%