Back

Calibrated high-throughput electrophysiology enables clinical interpretation of CACNA1G missense variants

Finol-Urdaneta, R. K.; Tan, C.-Y.; Maksemous, N.; Ma, J. G.; Lockhart, P.; Snell, P.; Malhotra, A.; Thompson, B. A.; Garg, G.; Goel, H.; Griffiths, L. R.; Adams, D. J.; Vandenberg, J. I.; Ng, C. A.

2026-05-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.10.724145 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveAccurate classification of ion channel variants of uncertain significance (VUS) remains a persistent challenge in clinical genomics, limiting diagnostic resolution in neurological disorders. MethodsWe developed a calibrated electrophysiological framework to generate functional evidence for clinical interpretation of CACNA1G variants encoding the low-voltage-activated calcium channel Cav3.1. Functional metrics derived from automated patchclamp recordings were calibrated against benign/likely benign (B/LB) and pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) reference variants to enable conservative application of ACMG/AMP functional criteria within clinical variant interpretation workflows. ResultsCalibration using 25 B/LB and 16 P/LP CACNA1G variants showed that more than 80% of P/LP variants exhibited reduced current density (CD). Deactivation kinetics ({tau}Deact) provided complementary discriminatory information by identifying gating abnormalities in variants with preserved CD. Application of this dual-metric framework to five VUS identified in Australian patients revealed two variants (Cav3.1-R186Q and R1394Q) with abnormal functional profiles consistent with voltage-sensor perturbation, supporting reassessment as likely pathogenic under ACMG/AMP guidelines. The remaining VUS displayed functional properties overlapping the benign reference distribution. ConclusionThese findings establish a calibrated functional framework for generating electrophysiological evidence that supports clinical interpretation of CACNA1G missense variants under ACMG/AMP guidelines. When applied as external functional evidence, this approach improves resolution of CACNA1G-associated VUS while maintaining conservative standards for variant classification.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
6
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.5%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
12
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
25
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
29
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
30
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%