Back

Family functioning and psychiatric outcomes in children and young people with intellectual and developmental disabilities caused by rare genetic mutations

Haddon, J. E.; Hall, J. H.; IMAGINE ID, ; Hall, J.; Owen, M. J.; van den Bree, M. B. M.

2026-05-13 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.05.10.26352561 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundA range of rare chromosomal micro-deletions or -duplications (Copy Number Variants - CNVs) are associated with high risk of neurodevelopmental and mental health conditions (ND-CNVs). There is great individual variability in outcomes, but we lack insights into the contributing social factors, including family functioning. MethodsCaregivers of 598 children and young people (CYP) with a range of 16 ND-CNVs and 222 siblings without ND-CNVs (controls) completed questionnaires on overall family climate (cohesion and conflict) as well as caregiver-CYP relationship warmth and hostility and took part in a research diagnostic interview about CYPs psychiatric symptoms. CYPs intelligence quotient (IQ) was also measured. ResultsComparisons with published data from neurotypical families indicated that families affected by ND-CNVs are characterised by higher family cohesion and conflict as well as lower caregiver-CYP warmth and hostility. Symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder reduced more steeply in CYP with ND-CNVs compared to controls with increasing family cohesion (interaction effect: {beta} = -0.14, p = 4.65 x 10-{superscript 2}). In contrast, they rose more steeply with increasing family conflict (interaction effect: {beta} = 0.18, p = 1.05 x 10-{superscript 2}). Furthermore, symptoms of mood disorder increased more steeply with increased caregiver-CYP hostility in CYP with ND-CNVs (interaction effect: {beta} = 0.15, p = 4.55 x 10-{superscript 2}). ConclusionsRaising a CYP with a rare genetic condition is challenging. Timely access to interventions that support caregivers in fostering a positive family environment may reduce behavioural difficulties in CYP, with subsequent benefits for family functioning.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.