Back

Functional data for LDLR variant classification: comparative insights from high-content microscopy and flow cytometry assays

Islam, M. M.; Alves, A. C.; Graca, R.; Chora, J. R.; Bourbon, M.; Pfisterer, S.

2026-05-13 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.09.26352817 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aimsCurrent FH VCEP specifications of ACMG/AMP guidelines for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) variant interpretation assign a higher evidence weight to functional data obtained with flow cytometry than microscopy assays, due to lack of existing evidence. This restricts the use of microscopy-derived functional data for variant classification. We aimed to systematically compare functional data of LDLR variants obtained by high-content microscopy and flow cytometry to determine their concordance and assess whether microscopy-based assays could support a higher evidence level. MethodsFifty LDLR variants with available flow cytometry and high-content microscopy data were compared for LDL uptake activity, including 21 newly characterized variants by microscopy in this study. Variants were grouped by FH VCEP functional thresholds (<70% activity, abnormal function; >90% activity, normal function) and results were integrated with UK Biobank data to assess associations with lipid traits. ResultsFirst, we validated our scalable microscopy assay with FH VCEP-classified control variants. Then we compared functional activity measured by microscopy and flow cytometry assays for 50 variants, which showed significant correlation (r = 0.66, p<0.0001) and a close average agreement (Bland-Altman bias = -0.05). Applying FH VCEP functional classification thresholds yielded broadly consistent classification in both methods, with minor shifts among categories. Integration with UK Biobank data showed that carriers of variants with reduced LDLR activity (<70% and <50%) had higher LDL-C, total cholesterol and ApoB levels compared to those with normal activity (>90%) for both microscopy and flow cytometry assays, with more pronounced differences observed at the <50% LDLR activity threshold. ConclusionHigh-content microscopy provides reliable and scalable measurements of LDLR function, showing high concordance with flow cytometry and consistent associations with lipid phenotypes. These findings support reconsideration of the evidence weight assigned to validated microscopy assays within FH VCEP variant classification frameworks, namely to Strong (Level 1).

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.4%
2
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
3
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
6
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
7
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
8
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
17
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
29
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%