Functional data for LDLR variant classification: comparative insights from high-content microscopy and flow cytometry assays
Islam, M. M.; Alves, A. C.; Graca, R.; Chora, J. R.; Bourbon, M.; Pfisterer, S.
Show abstract
Background and aimsCurrent FH VCEP specifications of ACMG/AMP guidelines for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) variant interpretation assign a higher evidence weight to functional data obtained with flow cytometry than microscopy assays, due to lack of existing evidence. This restricts the use of microscopy-derived functional data for variant classification. We aimed to systematically compare functional data of LDLR variants obtained by high-content microscopy and flow cytometry to determine their concordance and assess whether microscopy-based assays could support a higher evidence level. MethodsFifty LDLR variants with available flow cytometry and high-content microscopy data were compared for LDL uptake activity, including 21 newly characterized variants by microscopy in this study. Variants were grouped by FH VCEP functional thresholds (<70% activity, abnormal function; >90% activity, normal function) and results were integrated with UK Biobank data to assess associations with lipid traits. ResultsFirst, we validated our scalable microscopy assay with FH VCEP-classified control variants. Then we compared functional activity measured by microscopy and flow cytometry assays for 50 variants, which showed significant correlation (r = 0.66, p<0.0001) and a close average agreement (Bland-Altman bias = -0.05). Applying FH VCEP functional classification thresholds yielded broadly consistent classification in both methods, with minor shifts among categories. Integration with UK Biobank data showed that carriers of variants with reduced LDLR activity (<70% and <50%) had higher LDL-C, total cholesterol and ApoB levels compared to those with normal activity (>90%) for both microscopy and flow cytometry assays, with more pronounced differences observed at the <50% LDLR activity threshold. ConclusionHigh-content microscopy provides reliable and scalable measurements of LDLR function, showing high concordance with flow cytometry and consistent associations with lipid phenotypes. These findings support reconsideration of the evidence weight assigned to validated microscopy assays within FH VCEP variant classification frameworks, namely to Strong (Level 1).
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- LDLR Variant Classification for Improved Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Familial Hypercholesterolemia 95%
- Familial hypercholesterolemia: a single-nucleotide variant (SNV) in mosaic at the Low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) 94%
- Functional interrogation of cellular Lp(a) uptake by genome-scale CRISPR screening 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population genomic screening leads to improved lipid management in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia 94%
- A common polymorphism that protects from cardiovascular disease increases fibronectin processing and secretion 92%
- Coronary Artery Disease Risk of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genetic Variants Independent of Historical Cholesterol Exposure 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigation of an LPA KIV-2 nonsense mutation in 11,000 individuals: the importance of linkage disequilibrium structure in LPA genetics. 93%
- Novel protein-altering variants associated with serum apolipoprotein and lipid levels 92%
- Beyond gene-disease validity: capturing structured data on inheritance, allelic-requirement, disease-relevant variant classes, and disease mechanism for inherited cardiac conditions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Precision Diagnostic Approach to Predict 5-year Risk for Microvascular Complications in Type 1 Diabetes 90%
- Transcriptome and fatty-acid signatures of adipocyte hypertrophy and its non-invasive MR-based characterization in human adipose tissue 89%
- Metabolomics in juvenile-onset SLE: identifying new biomarkers to predict cardiovascular risk 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.