Back

Assessing pollinator community recovery in restored agroecosystems using the recovery debt framework

Cano, D.; Perez, A. J.; Martinez-Nunez, C.; Tarifa, R.; Salido, T.; Ruiz, C.; Guitierrez, J. E.; Alcantara, J. M.; Rey, P. J.

2026-05-13 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.08.723832 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recovery debt (RD) quantifies the interim deficit of biodiversity and function during the recovery process after disturbance. Unlike typical recovery indices derived from data on experimental-control comparisons, RD further considers the target (reference) biodiversity level, modelling the rate at which it is approached over time. However, the application of the RD approach to active restoration has not been explicitly implemented to date. Here, we extend the RD framework to evaluate active ecological restoration in agricultural systems, defining the onset of recovery as the shift from intensive to wildlife-friendly management. We applied this approach to assess short-term pollinator recovery in 14 olive groves across a gradient of farming intensification and landscape complexity in southern Spain. Restoration actions included adopting low-intensity ground cover management and actively restoring field margins. At one, three, and five years post-restoration, we assessed community responses by quantifying bee abundance, species richness, plant-bee network properties, and flower visitation rates. Reference systems were defined by olive groves in complex landscapes with low-intensity herb cover management and organic farming practices. Following restoration, the RD of bee abundance decreased from 71% to 55%. We found no significant effects of pre-intervention agricultural management on RD. Instead, across sites, the reduction of the RD (i.e., recovery) of bee abundance, richness, network connectance and flower visitation rate was strongly mediated by the availability of high-quality semi-natural areas in the surrounding landscape and by the ecological contrast created by restoration interventions at both the farm and floral patch levels. RD for other network metrics showed no significant pattern of variation. Our study demonstrates that wildlife-friendly management and targeted habitat restoration can rapidly reduce recovery debt for bee abundance and function in permanent agroecosystems. However, the recovery of more complex interaction-network properties likely requires longer timescales.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.6%
2
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
6
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
9
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
14
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
24
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
30
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%