Back

Spatially Resolved Banff Tubulitis and Glomerulitis Scoring in Kidney Allograft Biopsies via Artificial Intelligent-Based Structure Segmentation and Spatial Transcriptomics

Kates, H.; Lee, C.; Paul, A. S.; Ansari, I.; Tatke, A.; Lee, T.; Nguyen, M.-T.; Eadon, M. T.; Sarder, P.; Chen Wongworawat, Y.

2026-05-12 pathology
10.64898/2026.05.08.723594 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTubulitis is a defining histologic feature of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), while glomerulitis is often characteristic of antibody mediated rejection (AMR). Histologic quantification of tubulitis and glomerulitis using Banff criteria is subject to interobserver variability. Bulk transcriptomic assays (e.g., MMDx) have introduced molecular correlations of tubulitis with TCMR and glomerulitis with AMR, but lack spatial resolution. MethodsWe applied a web-based platform, FUSION (Functional Unit State Identification in Whole Slide Images), to a cohort of 8 cases (n=2 per condition) with kidney allograft biopsy samples acute TCMR, active AMR, chronic active AMR, and no rejection (control). The machine-learning (ML) platform enabled integrated visualization and analysis of spatial transcriptomics (10x Genomics Visium v2) together with high-resolution whole-slide histology. ResultsTranscriptomics-derived immune cell proportions within AI-segmented tubular and glomerular regions were used to generate spatial Banff t- and g-scores. Derived t-scores showed full concordance with pathologist scores in both acute TCMR cases; g-scores showed concordance in 2 of 4 AMR cases, with discordant cases characterized by low absolute immune signal near the classification boundary. ConclusionsWe demonstrate the feasibility of using AI-based FTU segmentation integrated with spatial transcriptomics-derived immune cell proportions to generate spatially informed t- and g-scores aligned with Banff criteria, with full concordance in severe rejection and partial concordance in mild rejection. This approach lays the foundation for validated, spatial transcriptomics-augmented t-scores and g-scores that enhance diagnostic precision, reduces inter-observer variability among renal pathologists, and support potential clinical adoption.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
Kidney International Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
11
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
22
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%