Back

Three Decades of FDA Authorizations of AI/ML Enabled Medical Devices: Persistent Specialty Concentration and the Care Delivery Gap (1995 to 2025)

Golshani, P.; Joseph, M. S.

2026-05-12 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.08.26352766 medRxiv
Show abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintains a public list of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-enabled medical devices that have received marketing authorization. Prior published analyses examined this list at earlier time points and reported a marked dominance of radiology applications. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of all 1,430 AI/ML-enabled medical device authorizations recorded by the FDA between September 1995 and December 2025 to characterize the cumulative growth, specialty distribution, and manufacturer concentration of authorized devices. The annual authorization volume increased from a mean of 1.8 per year between 1995 and 2014 to 264 per year between 2023 and 2025, with 331 authorizations recorded in 2025 alone. Devices reviewed by the FDAs Radiology panel accounted for 1,094 of 1,430 authorizations (76.5%), and the three most represented panels (Radiology, Cardiovascular, and Neurology) accounted for 90.6% of all authorizations. Several large clinical specialties were represented by very small numbers of authorized devices, including Pathology (n = 9), Microbiology (n = 6), and Obstetrics and Gynecology (n = 4). No authorizations were recorded under a psychiatry or behavioral health review panel. Of 740 unique companies, 502 (67.8%) had a single authorized device, while 13 companies (1.8%) accounted for 217 devices (15.2%). The cumulative regulatory record demonstrates rapid growth that has been concentrated in image-rich diagnostic specialties, with limited representation across many specialties that account for substantial clinical activity in the United States. These findings may inform policy discussions about where regulatory, infrastructure, and dataset investments are most needed to broaden the clinical scope of medical AI.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.0%
2
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
4
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
19
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
30
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%