Back

Evaluating trends in new cases of Work-Related Mental Ill-health after introduction of The Health and Safety Executives Management Standards

Gittins, M.; Iheozor-Ejiofor, Z.; Carder, M.; Money, A.; Iskandar, I.; Gartland, N.; Fishwick, D.; Seed, M.; Mchale, G.; Byrne, L.; van Tongeren, M.

2026-05-12 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.05.08.26352738 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWork-related stress (WRS) accounts for 52% of self-reported work-related ill-health. In 2004, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) developed the Management Standards (MS), aimed at helping organisations reduce WRS. This work investigates WRS post implementation, with reference to six MS risk factor domains: control, support, relationships, demand, change, and role. MethodCases of WRS were extracted from The Health and Occupation Research (THOR) database and mapped to the six domains. Trends in WRS incidence rates attributed to each of the domains were split at 2004 and compared with the overall WRS trend using mixed generalised regression models. ResultsBefore 2004, annual incidence in WRS increased by 1.4%(-0.5%,3.1%), whereas after 2004, there was a decrease of -0.9%(-1.5%,-0.2%), based on 10,815 WRS cases reported between 1996 and 2019. Three of the six MS domains (demands, relationships, and change) were reported in [~]82% of cases. Pre-2004, four of the six domains were observed to be increasing per year. Post 2004, cases increasingly contained multiple precipitating events e.g. demands + another (+2.6% per year) and relationships + another (6.1%). Reports of the two most common domains decreased post 2004 (demands -0.46%, relationships -0.55% per year), whereas incidence in less common domains increased (change 1.1%, support 2.4%, control 4.8%, role 4.7%). ConclusionTrends in WRS, and their common risk factors appear to be decreasing gradually, since introduction of MS in 2004. However, less common risk factors are becoming more prominent, contributing to reporting of WRS with multiple risk factors.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
6
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
10
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
12
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
15
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%