Evaluating trends in new cases of Work-Related Mental Ill-health after introduction of The Health and Safety Executives Management Standards
Gittins, M.; Iheozor-Ejiofor, Z.; Carder, M.; Money, A.; Iskandar, I.; Gartland, N.; Fishwick, D.; Seed, M.; Mchale, G.; Byrne, L.; van Tongeren, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundWork-related stress (WRS) accounts for 52% of self-reported work-related ill-health. In 2004, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) developed the Management Standards (MS), aimed at helping organisations reduce WRS. This work investigates WRS post implementation, with reference to six MS risk factor domains: control, support, relationships, demand, change, and role. MethodCases of WRS were extracted from The Health and Occupation Research (THOR) database and mapped to the six domains. Trends in WRS incidence rates attributed to each of the domains were split at 2004 and compared with the overall WRS trend using mixed generalised regression models. ResultsBefore 2004, annual incidence in WRS increased by 1.4%(-0.5%,3.1%), whereas after 2004, there was a decrease of -0.9%(-1.5%,-0.2%), based on 10,815 WRS cases reported between 1996 and 2019. Three of the six MS domains (demands, relationships, and change) were reported in [~]82% of cases. Pre-2004, four of the six domains were observed to be increasing per year. Post 2004, cases increasingly contained multiple precipitating events e.g. demands + another (+2.6% per year) and relationships + another (6.1%). Reports of the two most common domains decreased post 2004 (demands -0.46%, relationships -0.55% per year), whereas incidence in less common domains increased (change 1.1%, support 2.4%, control 4.8%, role 4.7%). ConclusionTrends in WRS, and their common risk factors appear to be decreasing gradually, since introduction of MS in 2004. However, less common risk factors are becoming more prominent, contributing to reporting of WRS with multiple risk factors.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic inequalities among NHS staff in England - workplace experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- The psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on 4,378 UK healthcare workers and ancillary staff: initial baseline data from a cohort study collected during the first wave of the pandemic 94%
- Covid-19 Risk by work-related factors: Pooled analysis of individual linked data from 14 cohorts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Relationship between Continuity of Care with a Primary Care Provider and Duration of Work Disability in Workers with Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study 94%
- Symptoms of anxiety and depression in relation to work patterns during the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in Philadelphia PA: a cross-sectional survey 94%
- A cross-sectional study of the mismatch between telecommuting preference and frequency associated with psychological distress among Japanese workers in the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of UK healthcare workers 94%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 93%
- Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia 93%
- Physiotherapy Under Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study on The Interplay Between Perfectionism, Moral Injury, and Burnout 93%
- Anxiety and Depression among Medical Doctors in Catalonia, Italy, and the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 93%
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 92%
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.