Back

Development and Validation of a Multimodal Clinical, Pathologic, and Genomic Model for Breast Cancer Recurrence

Nguyen, N.-K.; Li, A.; Kochanny, S.; Dolezal, J.; Ramesh, S.; Shamai, G.; Zhao, J.; Nanda, R.; Chen, N.; Olopade, O. I.; Sullivan, M.; Flores, E. M.; Khramtsova, G.; Jain-Liu, S.; Medenwald, R.; Saha, P.; McCart, L.; Watson, M.; Symmans, W. F.; Kalinsky, K.; Pusztai, L.; Gala, M.; Paul, E. D.; Huraiova, B.; Cekan, P.; Partridge, A. H.; Carey, L.; Stover, D.; Yao, K.; Sparano, J. A.; Huo, D.; Pearson, A. T.; Howard, F. M.

2026-05-12 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.08.26352562 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo develop and validate a multimodal recurrence-risk model integrating histology, genomic testing, and clinical variables. MethodsWe developed AI-Path, a whole-slide image biomarker for recurrence prediction trained in CALGB 9344, and validated it in three independent cohorts: TAILORx, a multi-site Chicago cohort, and the MDX-BRCA cohort. We then integrated AI-Path with Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS), tumor size, and nodal status into a Cox model, PathClinRS, fit using 60% of cases from TAILORx, with the remaining 40% held out for validation. The primary end point was distant recurrence-free interval. Performance was assessed using Harrells concordance index (C-index) and Kaplan-Meier analyses. ResultsA total of 12,418 patients were included. In TAILORx, AI-Path outperformed RS for distant recurrence (C-index, 0.682 vs 0.647; P = .038), driven by superior prediction of late recurrence (0.656 vs 0.567; P < .001). In node-negative disease, PathClinRS outperformed RSClin in the TAILORx fitting (0.72 vs 0.70; P = .016) and validation sets (0.74 vs 0.70; P = .004). In node-positive disease, PathClinRS outperformed RSClinN+ in Chicago (0.94 vs 0.74; P < .001) and MDX-BRCA (0.71 vs 0.66; P = .004) cohorts. Compared with NATALEE eligibility, PathClinRS identified nearly twice as many high-risk node-negative patients while maintaining a comparable 10-year distant recurrence risk (16.7% vs 16.6% per NATALEE eligibility in TAILORx fitting; 21.0% vs 19.4% in TAILORx validation). PathClinRS identified 68% of intermediate risk premenopausal patients as low-risk with no evidence of chemotherapy benefit, compared to only 36% identified as low risk by standard clinicopathologic criteria. ConclusionDigital histopathology provides prognostic information complementary to genomic assays and has the potential to personalize therapy beyond existing clinicogenomic tools.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.2%
2
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
8
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
9
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
13
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
19
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
22
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.6%
24
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%