Associations between screen use and antisocial behaviour in children and adolescents across development

BackgroundScreen use is pervasive in childhood and adolescence, yet its role in antisocial behaviour (ASB) remains uncertain. While cross-sectional studies consistently link higher screen use to elevated ASB, longitudinal evidence is mixed, and few studies have controlled adequately for prior behaviour and genetic liability. Thus, it remains unclear whether these associations reflect prospective influences of screen exposure, or underlying vulnerabilities shared with ASB. We investigated whether screen use is a modifiable risk factor or a marker of underlying vulnerability. MethodsWe analysed data from up to 41,562 children in the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). ASB traits and ICD-10-based conduct disorder (CD) diagnoses were assessed at ages 5, 8 and 14 years, together with screen use (total exposure and modality). Cross-sectional logistic regression models examined associations between screen use and ASB traits/CD at each age, adjusting for sex and parental education. Polygenic risk scores for ASB (PRSASB) were used to assess genetic susceptibility and gene-environment interplay. Lagged logistic models tested whether screen use predicted later ASB, adjusting for prior ASB. Linear mixed-effects models examined developmental patterns across age. ResultsHigher screen use was positively associated with ASB traits and CD across all ages, with dose-response patterns across screen-use modalities. Social media showed the strongest modality-specific association at adolescence. In lagged models, screen use did not predict later ASB after adjustment for prior ASB. Longitudinal models showed significant but attenuating associations across development. PRSASB was independently and additively associated with ASB outcomes but did not interact with screen use. ConclusionsWe found that higher screen use was consistently associated with antisocial outcomes across childhood and adolescence. However, the absence of prospective associations after accounting for prior behaviour, together with independent genetic contributions, suggests that screen use may be better understood as a marker of underlying vulnerability rather than an independent driver of antisocial development.