Back

Test-retest reliable and site-robust Hidden Markov Model framework for discovering whole-brain beta activity

Korkealaakso, S.; Ahrends, C.; Liljeström, M.; Vidaurre, D.; Renvall, H.; Pauls, K. A. M.

2026-05-11 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.07.723415 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sensorimotor beta activity (13-30 Hz) is a key neuronal signature in the human sensorimotor system, and its features can be effectively measured using functional brain imaging methods such as magnetoencephalography (MEG). In addition to its importance in healthy brain processing, beta activity has been shown to be altered in several neurological diseases, underscoring its potential as a biomarker. To serve as biomarkers, features must be reliably defined, stable across measurements and, ideally, amenable to automated analysis, yet current approaches to beta characterization require subjective decisions and manual work. We here describe a hidden Markov model (HMM) based approach to automatically segment beta events from source level MEG beta band activity into discrete high- and low-beta states. We demonstrate the differences between the proposed HMM based approach and a commonly used amplitude-envelope based approach to analyse high- and low-beta modulation. We show that the methods complement each other both when applied to resting data and task related passive movement data. Furthermore, we assess the test-retest reliability of the proposed pipeline within individuals using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and test if HMM constructed at one measurement site can be applied to data acquired at another site, thereby evaluating its multisite transferability. We show that the proposed approach produces stable results within subjects and across sites for many of the features. The ICC values were excellent for high-beta state (86-100% of brain areas), while low-beta state test-retest reliability was more modest. Most of the features showed statistically significant differences between sites only in a few brain areas, indicating very good multisite stability. The proposed approach can serve as an automated, reproducible analysis pipeline for, e.g., clinical applications, and appears suitable for multi-site datasets.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
28.6%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
10
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
12
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
13
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
17
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
23
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%