Back

Psychosocial mediators for the impact of personal genomic risk information on melanoma prevention and early detection behaviors

Wang, S. E.; Espinoza, D.; Lo, S.; Smit, A. K.; Cust, A. E.

2026-05-10 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.07.26352695 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn the Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk Study, access to personal genomic risk testing led to improvements in some melanoma prevention and early detection behaviors. PurposeWe aimed to examine the hypothesized psychosocial mediators of the effects observed in the trial. MethodsAustralians of European ancestry without melanoma and aged 18-69 years were recruited via the national Medicare database and randomized to receive personal genomic risk information or usual care (N=1,025). Questionnaires were administered at baseline, 1-month post-intervention, and 12-months post-baseline to assess self-reported prevention and early detection behaviors and psychosocial measures. To identify potential mediators, we first evaluated the interventions effect on psychosocial measures and the associations between psychosocial measures and behavioral outcomes. We then estimated the natural indirect effects (NIEs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify the effects mediated by potential mediators identified. ResultsAmong participants with high traditional melanoma risk, the interventions effect on increased sun protection at 1-month was partially mediated by changes in perceived importance [NIE mean difference (95% CI): 0.02 (0.00, 0.04)] and perceived effectiveness [0.01 (0.00, 0.03)] of sun protection strategies. Among women, the interventions effect on increased whole-body skin examinations at 1-month was partially mediated by perceived capability to engage in skin examinations [NIE odds ratio (95% CI): 1.08 (1.00, 1.29)] and perceived control over detecting a future melanoma [1.13 (1.03, 1.32)]. ConclusionsThe effectiveness of precision prevention and early detection interventions may be enhanced by targeting key psychosocial mediators through tailored communication of personal melanoma risk.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.