Self and Caregiver Reported Choice Making in Autistic Adults: Development and Validation of the AASPIRE Choices and Decisions Scale
Kim, S. Y.; Gillespie-Lynch, K.; Kapp, S.; Yang, L.-Q.; Wallington, A. F.; Raymaker, D.; Moura, I.; McDonald, K.; Maslak, J.; Kripke-Ludwig, R.; Joyce, A.; Horner-Johnson, W.; Frowner, E.; Baker-Ericzen, M.; Nicolaidis, C.
Show abstract
Self-determination has been assessed as an internal psychological construct. External factors may also affect self-determination, but opportunities to make choices and decisions remain understudied. We developed and evaluated the AASPIRE-Choices and Decisions Scale (AASPIRE-CDS), a new measure of autistic adults opportunities to make choices and decisions, using a community-based participatory approach. We created and refined the AASPIRE-CDS through an iterative process. Data, from the AASPIRE Outcomes Project, included 839 autistic adults participating through direct report, supported direct report, and caregiver report (CR). Exploratory and confirmatory analyses supported a unidimensional structure. Measurement invariance analyses supported configural, metric, and partial scalar invariance across report type without CR, and across living status, with and without CR. The AASPIRE-CDS showed high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to change over time. Convergent validity analyses showed that higher AASPIRE-CDS scores were associated with greater self-determination and communication fluency, more independent living, and fewer support needs. The AASPIRE-CDS showed weaker (albeit significant) associations with quality of life, overall health, and employment satisfaction than the self-determination measure showed with these variables. This pattern suggests that opportunities for choice-making are related to, but distinct from, commonly used measures of self-determination. Findings support the AASPIRE-CDS as a valid and reliable measure of choice-making opportunities in autistic adults across support needs but suggest caution interpreting CR. They underscore the importance of supporting autistic adults choice-making and evaluating opportunities for choice alongside internal self-determination. Future research should use larger CR samples to examine the validity of caregiver-reported choice-making opportunities.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mindfulness supports emotional resilience in children during the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- Study protocol for the EYEdentify project: An examination of gaze behaviour in autistic adults using a virtual reality-based paradigm 92%
- The lived experience of rejection sensitivity in ADHD - a qualitative exploration 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Brief Observation of Symptoms of Autism (BOSA): Development of a New Adapted Assessment Measure for Remote Telehealth Administration through COVID-19 and Beyond 94%
- Combinatorial language parent-report score differs significantly between typically developing children and those with Autism Spectrum Disorders 93%
- Theory of Mind and Moral Decision-Making in the Context of Autism Spectrum Disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coordination difficulties, IQ and psychopathology in children with high-risk Copy Number Variants 91%
- Impulsive adolescents exhibit inefficient processing and a low decision threshold when decoding facial expressions of emotions 90%
- Approaches to improve mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissociation of early and late face-related processes in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Williams syndrome 87%
- Good communication is critical to supporting people living and working with a rare disease: current rare disease support perceived as inadequate. 86%
- Developing a taxonomy of care coordination for people living with rare conditions: A qualitative study 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence and developmental course of auditory processing differences in autistic children 93%
- Imputing cognitive impairment in SPARK, a large autism cohort 92%
- Cognitive abilities and irritability are the main factors influencing initial placement of autistic preschoolers in special or mainstream education 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.