Back

Patterns of emergency department use among young people with bipolar disorder: A data linkage cohort study

Turner, A.; Hickie, I. B.; Varidel, M.; Ho, N.; McHugh, C. M.; Crouse, J. J.; Carpenter, J. S.; Nichles, A.; Zmicerevska, N.; Song, Y. J.; Scott, E. M.; Iorfino, F.

2026-05-10 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.05.07.26352617 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo charactertise emergency department (ED) use among young people with bipolar disorder (BD) and compare patterns to those observed in anxiety, depressive, and psychotic disorders. Design, setting and participantsData linkage study using administrative ED presentation records (January 2020 to October 2020) and a transdiagnostic youth mental health cohort of 2243 individuals aged 12-30 years in New South Wales, Australia. Main outcome measuresED presentation patterns (any presentation, frequency, and rates) and reasons for presentation (mental health-related and non-mental health-related). ResultsOf the 354 young people with BD, 309 (87.3%) presented to an ED at least once. ED presentation rates were higher for BD than for anxiety (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.82, p<.001) and depressive disorders (IRR=1.32, p<.001), but similar to psychotic disorders (IRR=0.91, p=.379). Differences were primarily driven by mental health-related presentations. Recurrent mental health presentations were associated with illness progression (clinical stage and functional impairment) rather than diagnosis. However, the likelihood of mental health-related presentations remained higher in BD compared with anxiety and depressive disorders after adjustment. ConclusionsYoung people with BD have high rates of ED use, comparable to those with psychotic disorders. Although mental health-related presentations are more common in BD than in anxiety and depressive disorders, recurrence is largely explained by markers of illness progression. These findings highlight the need for community-based services that provide continuous and coordinated care for young people with complex mental health needs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.2%
3
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
10
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
12
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
13
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%