Back

Automated Brain and CSF Volume Assessment in Infant Hydrocephalus Using Deep Learning

Yu, M.; Yoshikawa, M. H.; Luviano, A. S.; Schiff, S. J.; Monga, V.; Warf, B. C.; Grant, P. E.; Sutin, J.; Lin, P.-Y.

2026-05-08 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.07.26352592 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume assessment is essential for pediatric hydrocephalus management. Current clinical practice relies on linear measurements that fail to capture complex three-dimensional ventricular morphology, while quantitative volumetric assessment remains limited by laborious processing and lack of clinically optimized automated tools. This study developed a rapid, automated AI-based intracranial segmentation model suitable for clinical workflows. We retrospectively analyzed 167 T2-weighted MRI scans from infants with hydrocephalus, randomly split into training (60%), validation (20%), and hold-out test (20%) sets. All scans were manually segmented into CSF, brain parenchyma, and background. Our model integrates DenseNet and U-Net architectures with feature smoothness regularization to enhance generalizability. Performance was evaluated using Dice scores and absolute relative volume error (ARVE) compared with state-of-the-art methods. The AI model achieved Dice scores of 95.7% for CSF and 96.4% for brain parenchyma on the hold-out test set, significantly outperforming FSL FAST (85.0% and 77.9%) and contemporary deep learning approaches (90.4% and 89.7%). Processing time was 0.8 seconds per scan using GPU acceleration. The model demonstrated consistent performance across different hydrocephalus etiologies and effectively handled challenging scenarios including noise, artifacts, and variable resolution. This study successfully developed a robust MRI segmentation model demonstrating superior accuracy and efficiency compared to existing methods. By incorporating domain-specific enhancements, the model enables rapid, clinically viable brain and CSF volume estimation for pediatric hydrocephalus care.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.6%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.8%
3
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
5
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
6
Neuro-Oncology Advances
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
13
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
15
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Brain Research Bulletin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
20
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%