Back

Quantifying the spatio-temporal image degradation under motion blur in fluorescence microscopy

Korovin, S.; Ugurlu, K.; Kalisvaart, D.; Kok, M.; Heintzmann, R.; Prakash, K.; Smith, C.

2026-05-08 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.06.723301 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The spatial resolution of optical imaging systems is fundamentally restricted by the diffraction limit. However, in widefield live-cell microscopy, the achievable resolution is further constrained by the specimen motion, which indicates the existence of a fundamental spatio-temporal resolution trade-off between signal accumulation during the full frame integration and the resulting motion blur. To improve the fidelity with which moving objects can be imaged, a quantitative understanding of this spatio-temporal trade-off is necessary. Here, we present a systematic analysis of motion-induced resolution dynamics measured with spectral signal-to-noise ratio (SSNR). We developed a simulation framework which models the image formation of objects undergoing arbitrary motion, to evaluate the degradation of the spatial resolution under translational and rotational dynamics. Our results demonstrate that for translating objects, the spatial resolution is anisotropically reduced as a function of the orientation of the object relative to the motion vector, leading to the spectral signal-to-noise ratio degrading by up to 50% and the resolution by up to 40% for a 90{degrees} change in the motion direction. Furthermore, we show that for rotational motion, conventional radially averaged metrics such as the Fourier Ring Correlation are not able to quantify the effects of angular blur. On the other hand, the SSNR is able to accurately quantify this degradation. These findings underscore the necessity of an object-oriented imaging approach, in which acquisition parameters such as exposure time are tuned to specific biological spatio-temporal characteristics to optimize the trade-off between motion blur and spatial fidelity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.0%
3
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
4
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
9
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
11
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
12
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
21
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%