Back

Adaptation to Environmental Variability Shapes Dormancy in Daphnia

Porter, R. J.; Bradshaw, L.; Marsh, I.; Doceti, M.; Bergland, A. O.

2026-05-07 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.06.723256 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dormancy is a widespread adaptive strategy that allows organisms to survive in temporally varying habitats by suspending development and reproduction. Although environmental variability is expected to shape dormancy strategies, it remains unclear how differences in environmental variability and predictability influence both the production of dormant embryos and the termination of dormancy. We addressed these questions by comparing D. pulex and D. obtusa, two closely related species that inhabit environments differing in variability and predictability. We hypothesized that D. obtusa, which inhabits ephemeral environments, would exhibit a greater propensity for sexual reproduction and dormancy and would require stronger cues to break dormancy than D. pulex, which occurs in more permanent, predictable habitats. Consistent with our hypothesis, D. obtusa lineages produced significantly more males and ephippia than D. pulex when reared under identical laboratory conditions, indicating greater investment in sexual reproduction and dormancy. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no difference in responsiveness to cues between the two species. Across species, embryos broke dormancy and hatched most readily after experiencing changes in cold and light, even if not experienced at the same time. In contrast, desiccation reduced the propensity to break dormancy. Together, these results indicate that species occupying more ephemeral environments invest more heavily in the production of dormant offspring, but that the environmental cues regulating dormancy termination appear broadly similar between species. This pattern suggests that while investment in dormancy may evolve in response to environmental variability, the mechanisms controlling dormancy termination are more conserved.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
4
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
7
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
15
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
17
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
23
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%