Back

Accelerating Mental Health Precision Trial : An Effective Visualization-Driven Tool for Power and Sample Size Estimation in Biomarker-based Study Designs

Chen, D. Z.; Xie, A.; Ma, C.

2026-05-08 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352613 medRxiv
Show abstract

Precision medicine has given rise to a spectrum of biomarker-guided trial designs, from simple enrichment and strategy designs to more complex adaptive frameworks. To address the need for user-friendly tools that span this spectrum, we developed a unified R Shiny platform that first implements three standard designs: the randomize-all design, the enrichment design, and the biomarker-strategy design, allowing researchers to perform power and sample size calculations under each framework with intuitive inputs and visual outputs. Building on this foundation, the platform further extends to support two-stage general randomized basket trial designs with interim analysis, which can be viewed as a generalization of the standard designs to multiple biomarker-defined subgroups. The tool was rigorously validated by comparison with established R pipelines and published formulas, and user testing confirmed its intuitive interface. By providing seamless integration from standard to advanced designs under a common input-output framework, our platform enables researchers to directly compare power and sample size requirements across different design choices using the same underlying assumptions. The result is a freely accessible tool offering effective visualizations for the full spectrum of biomarker-guided trial designs, available at https://ampt.obicloud.ca/. Future improvements may further expand the tools capabilities to accommodate the increasing complexity of trial designs needed by the research community.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.6%
2
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.9%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
6
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%