Back

Healthcare workers' acceptance of artificial intelligence in cardiac diagnosis: Implications for medical education and training programs

Hussein, G.; AlShammri, M.; Aldosari, M.; Alshehri, R.; Almasari, G.; Alabdulrahman, R.; Alarfaj, R.; Alrashed, A.; Al-Walah, M. A.

2026-05-10 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352604 medRxiv
Show abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in cardiology requires healthcare worker acceptance for successful implementation. Understanding attitudes and educational needs is crucial for developing effective training programs. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 408 healthcare workers treating cardiac diseases in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We assessed AI acceptance, knowledge levels, and training preferences using validated scales. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, correlation analysis, reliability testing, and multiple logistic regression. Of 408 participants, 407 provided complete responses. The sample comprised predominantly young (87.0% aged [≤]30), female (75.7%) medical residents (89.9%) with limited AI experience (86.7% never used AI clinically). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbachs = 0.892). Moderate acceptance was observed: 49.9% were aware of AI applications in cardiology, 46.7% were willing to learn, and 42.8% were willing to use AI clinically. However, 49.1% acknowledged lacking sufficient AI knowledge. Logistic regression identified willingness to learn (OR = 3.24, 95% CI: 2.15-4.89) and training interest (OR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.94-4.25) as the strongest predictors of AI acceptance. The model explained 68.4% of variance (Nagelkerke R{superscript 2} = 0.684) with an AUC of 0.847. Medical residents demonstrate moderate AI acceptance but significant knowledge gaps. Educational interventions--particularly hands-on learning and institutional training programs--are the strongest drivers of AI readiness, surpassing demographic predictors. Integrating AI literacy systematically into medical curricula is essential for successful AI adoption in cardiovascular care. Author summaryHealthcare workers worldwide are increasingly encountering artificial intelligence (AI) tools in clinical settings, yet their readiness to adopt these technologies--particularly in specialized fields like cardiology--remains poorly understood, especially in rapidly developing healthcare systems. In this study, we surveyed 407 healthcare workers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to understand their current attitudes, knowledge gaps, and learning preferences regarding AI in cardiac diagnosis. Our findings reveal that while most participants hold cautious optimism about AI, nearly half acknowledge lacking the knowledge needed to use it confidently. Crucially, we found that educational factors--specifically willingness to learn and interest in institutional training--were far stronger predictors of AI acceptance than demographic characteristics such as age or gender. This means that AI readiness is not a fixed trait determined by who someone is, but a teachable and trainable capacity. These results carry direct implications for medical educators and policymakers: structured, hands-on AI training integrated throughout medical curricula can meaningfully accelerate adoption of beneficial technologies in cardiovascular care and beyond.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.1%
2
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
3
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
5
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
9
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
15
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
16
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
17
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
18
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
21
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
23
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
24
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
25
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
27
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%