Healthcare workers' acceptance of artificial intelligence in cardiac diagnosis: Implications for medical education and training programs
Hussein, G.; AlShammri, M.; Aldosari, M.; Alshehri, R.; Almasari, G.; Alabdulrahman, R.; Alarfaj, R.; Alrashed, A.; Al-Walah, M. A.
Show abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in cardiology requires healthcare worker acceptance for successful implementation. Understanding attitudes and educational needs is crucial for developing effective training programs. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 408 healthcare workers treating cardiac diseases in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We assessed AI acceptance, knowledge levels, and training preferences using validated scales. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, correlation analysis, reliability testing, and multiple logistic regression. Of 408 participants, 407 provided complete responses. The sample comprised predominantly young (87.0% aged [≤]30), female (75.7%) medical residents (89.9%) with limited AI experience (86.7% never used AI clinically). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbachs = 0.892). Moderate acceptance was observed: 49.9% were aware of AI applications in cardiology, 46.7% were willing to learn, and 42.8% were willing to use AI clinically. However, 49.1% acknowledged lacking sufficient AI knowledge. Logistic regression identified willingness to learn (OR = 3.24, 95% CI: 2.15-4.89) and training interest (OR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.94-4.25) as the strongest predictors of AI acceptance. The model explained 68.4% of variance (Nagelkerke R{superscript 2} = 0.684) with an AUC of 0.847. Medical residents demonstrate moderate AI acceptance but significant knowledge gaps. Educational interventions--particularly hands-on learning and institutional training programs--are the strongest drivers of AI readiness, surpassing demographic predictors. Integrating AI literacy systematically into medical curricula is essential for successful AI adoption in cardiovascular care. Author summaryHealthcare workers worldwide are increasingly encountering artificial intelligence (AI) tools in clinical settings, yet their readiness to adopt these technologies--particularly in specialized fields like cardiology--remains poorly understood, especially in rapidly developing healthcare systems. In this study, we surveyed 407 healthcare workers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to understand their current attitudes, knowledge gaps, and learning preferences regarding AI in cardiac diagnosis. Our findings reveal that while most participants hold cautious optimism about AI, nearly half acknowledge lacking the knowledge needed to use it confidently. Crucially, we found that educational factors--specifically willingness to learn and interest in institutional training--were far stronger predictors of AI acceptance than demographic characteristics such as age or gender. This means that AI readiness is not a fixed trait determined by who someone is, but a teachable and trainable capacity. These results carry direct implications for medical educators and policymakers: structured, hands-on AI training integrated throughout medical curricula can meaningfully accelerate adoption of beneficial technologies in cardiovascular care and beyond.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 95%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- The experiences, challenges, and enablers for promoting interprofessional education among medical students: A Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 94%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
- Cardiology Knowledge Assessment of Retrieval-Augmented Open versus Proprietary Large Language Models 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 96%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 92%
- GenECG: A synthetic image-based ECG dataset to augment artificial intelligence-enhanced algorithm development 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 96%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 95%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.