Back

Current practices, challenges, and future directions in subcutaneous oncology monoclonal antibody delivery: A qualitative study

Franzese, C.; Anderson, M.; Wu, J.; Raj, A.; Coyne, M.; Biondi, S.

2026-05-08 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352582 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSubcutaneous oncology monoclonal antibodies (SCOmAbs) offer significant benefits compared to intravenous formulations, including reduced administration time and potential for self-administration. However, little has been published on real-world preparation and administration practices with these novel formulations. MethodsThis was a qualitative, exploratory study of 30 participants (10 patients receiving SCOmAbs, 10 nurses, and 10 pharmacists/pharmacy technicians) across various U.S. healthcare facilities. One-on-one, in-depth interviews examined current practices, pain points, device integration potential, projected impact of increased SCOmAb adoption, and perspectives on home administration. ResultsFindings revealed considerable variability in SCOmAb preparation and administration practices. While preparation methods generally aligned with typical parenteral workflows, notable deviations included bedside preparation by nurses (7/30), use of syringe pump modules (3/19), and one case of patient self-administration at home. Most participants utilized closed-system transfer devices (12/22) despite inconsistent hazardous drug treatment between facilities. Administration challenges included ergonomic difficulties for nurses during manual push (5/9 reporting physical discomfort) and variable injection techniques to accommodate patient comfort. Nurses reported significant workflow impact from being "tethered" to patients during administration, which could require staffing adjustments as SCOmAb frequency increases. Most patients (6/9) expressed interest in home administration for potential time savings and flexibility, though concerns about training, support, and safety were common. ConclusionsAs SCOmAb utilization expands, facilities may face barriers associated with increased demand that could necessitate innovative solutions. To leverage the full potential of SCOmAb products, developers should consider how next generation product presentations might minimize identified pain points, streamline administration, and facilitate safe transition to home self-administration. Delivery device integration, whether through prefilled syringes, portable infusion pumps, or other delivery systems, may address current challenges but requires careful consideration of facility infrastructure, product complexity and usability, workflow impact, and patient training requirements.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.4%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.4%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
6
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
11
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
20
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
21
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%