Back

Current practices, challenges, and future directions in subcutaneous oncology monoclonal antibody delivery: A qualitative study

Franzese, C.; Anderson, M.; Wu, J.; Raj, A.; Coyne, M.; Biondi, S.

2026-05-08 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352582 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSubcutaneous oncology monoclonal antibodies (SCOmAbs) offer significant benefits compared to intravenous formulations, including reduced administration time and potential for self-administration. However, little has been published on real-world preparation and administration practices with these novel formulations. MethodsThis was a qualitative, exploratory study of 30 participants (10 patients receiving SCOmAbs, 10 nurses, and 10 pharmacists/pharmacy technicians) across various U.S. healthcare facilities. One-on-one, in-depth interviews examined current practices, pain points, device integration potential, projected impact of increased SCOmAb adoption, and perspectives on home administration. ResultsFindings revealed considerable variability in SCOmAb preparation and administration practices. While preparation methods generally aligned with typical parenteral workflows, notable deviations included bedside preparation by nurses (7/30), use of syringe pump modules (3/19), and one case of patient self-administration at home. Most participants utilized closed-system transfer devices (12/22) despite inconsistent hazardous drug treatment between facilities. Administration challenges included ergonomic difficulties for nurses during manual push (5/9 reporting physical discomfort) and variable injection techniques to accommodate patient comfort. Nurses reported significant workflow impact from being "tethered" to patients during administration, which could require staffing adjustments as SCOmAb frequency increases. Most patients (6/9) expressed interest in home administration for potential time savings and flexibility, though concerns about training, support, and safety were common. ConclusionsAs SCOmAb utilization expands, facilities may face barriers associated with increased demand that could necessitate innovative solutions. To leverage the full potential of SCOmAb products, developers should consider how next generation product presentations might minimize identified pain points, streamline administration, and facilitate safe transition to home self-administration. Delivery device integration, whether through prefilled syringes, portable infusion pumps, or other delivery systems, may address current challenges but requires careful consideration of facility infrastructure, product complexity and usability, workflow impact, and patient training requirements.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
3
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.1%
4
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.6%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
8
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
11
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Drug Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
19
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Journal of Medical Economics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Health Science Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
25
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
26
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
27
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%