Back

ChatIBD: design, safeguards, and early international use of a guideline-grounded generative AI tool for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) professionals

Chuah, C. S.; Gros, B.; Plevris, N.

2026-05-07 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352526 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives To describe the design, operational safeguards, and early use of ChatIBD, a specialty-specific generative AI platform for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), during its first 6 months of live deployment. Methods ChatIBD is an online question-answering platform that uses retrieval-augmented generation over a curated corpus of IBD guidelines. Queries undergo hybrid semantic and keyword retrieval with query expansion and reranking, and the model is instructed to answer only from retrieved material and return linked citations. Safeguards include fixed medication dosing information from European Medicines Agency (EMA), user feedback capture, and clinician review of flagged outputs. We performed a descriptive service evaluation of aggregated, de-identified platform metrics collected between 1 October 2025 and 1 April 2026. Results During the study period, ChatIBD registered 913 users and processed 7,222 messages across 3,855 conversations. Activity was recorded across 69 countries and 28 languages, with the highest message volumes from the United Kingdom (27.1%) and Spain (12.3%). Median daily message volume was 35.5 (IQR 20 to 52), and 85.1% of messages were submitted on weekdays. Medication-related queries accounted for the largest use domain, while guideline synthesis was the most frequent inferred intent. Sixteen explicit feedback events were recorded, including one negative rating that triggered clinician review and system changes. Conclusions ChatIBD showed early international uptake and repeat use as a specialty-specific, retrieval-grounded generative AI tool for IBD professionals. These findings support the feasibility of deploying a guideline-grounded clinical AI service with practical safeguards, but do not establish response accuracy, safety, or clinical effectiveness. Formal validation is in progress.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.3%
2
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
5
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
8
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
11
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
28
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
30
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%