Back

Maximum Wall Thickness and Papillary Muscle Hypertrophy as Complementary Cardiac Biomarkers in Fabry Disease

Schüttler, M.; Witte, J.; Nordbeck, P.; Schindehütte, M.; Ankenbrand, M.

2026-05-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352512 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFabry disease (O_SCPLOWFDC_SCPLOW) is a rare and severe disease affecting multiple organ systems. However, its non-specific and heterogeneous presentation poses a critical challenge for early diagnosis, often delaying necessary treatment. In re-cent years, imaging-based biomarkers have been increasingly proposed to improve the understanding of O_SCPLOWFDC_SCPLOW and aid its diagnosis. This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of several previously proposed imaging-based cardiac biomarkers to assess their potential for diagnostic use. MethodsWe have developed a fully automated image analysis pipeline for quantifying cardiac metrics based on short-axis cine O_SCPLOWCMRC_SCPLOW data available on the UK Biobank. ResultsBased on the UK Biobank cohort, our analyses confirm the diagnostic relevance of the maximum myocardial wall thickness, a metric that mimics the current clinical practice for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy. Initial evidence also suggests that the PM/LV ratio, which measures the papillary muscle hypertrophy as the ratio between the areas of the papillary muscles and the left ventricular cavity, has potential prognostic relevance. ConclusionThis study contributes towards a better understanding of the cardiac presentation of FD, which may support future research in improving the diagnostic process. Additionally, our analysis pipeline can serve as a valuable basis for additional data analysis of imaging-based biomarkers for O_SCPLOWFDC_SCPLOW and other diseases.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.