Back

Positive Registration Rate as a Key Determinant of COCOA Effectiveness: Empirical Evidence from Individual-Level Key-Match Data during the Sixth and Seventh COVID-19 Waves in Japan

Nakagawa, S.; Kumagai, S.; Yamamoto, A.

2026-05-08 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352506 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCOCOA, Japans Bluetooth-based COVID-19 contact tracing app, was widely regarded as ineffective due to persistently low key-match counts. However, this assessment may have conflated two distinct phenomena: (1) a structurally suppressed positive registration rate caused by administrative friction in the HER-SYS linkage, and (2) genuine epidemiological inefficacy. ObjectiveTo empirically examine whether the correlation between individual COCOA key-match counts and regional COVID-19 case numbers depended on positive registration rate, using a unique longitudinal dataset from a single observer with a rigorously controlled behavioral pattern. MethodsThe corresponding author (S.N.) recorded daily key-match counts from his personal iPhone from January 10 to October 8, 2022, encompassing the Sixth Wave (January 10-April 20, 2022) and Seventh Wave (July 9-September 2, 2022). Daily reported COVID-19 cases in Tokyo were obtained from publicly available NHK data. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for each wave period separately. ResultsDuring the Sixth Wave, no meaningful correlation was observed between key-match counts and daily case numbers (r2 = 0.018, p = 0.059, n = 194). In contrast, during the Seventh Wave, a strong positive correlation emerged (r2 = 0.530, p < 0.001, n = 56). This correlation disappeared abruptly after September 12, 2022, coinciding with Japans revision of the mandatory full case reporting (Zenshu Todokedashi) policy, which substantially reduced positive registrations in COCOA. ConclusionsCOCOAs utility as an individual infection risk indicator was critically dependent on positive registration rate rather than app installation rate. These findings provide the first real-world empirical evidence supporting the threshold effect predicted by prior simulation studies, and offer important lessons for the design of digital tools in future pandemic preparedness.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.0%
3
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
8
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
14
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
16
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
18
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.8%
21
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Swiss Medical Weekly
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%