Back

Darwinian fitness, its directional derivative, and Hamilton's rule for limited dispersal with class structure under within and between generation environmental stochasticity

Lehmann, L.

2026-05-07 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.05.722983 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Darwinian fitness is equated here with invasion fitness and defined as the quantity determining the fate--certain extinction or possible spread--of a single mutant type. We derive it, together with its phenotypic derivative, for evolution in group-structured populations under limited genetic mixing, where the demography of the focal species and its environment is modeled as a discrete-time stochastic process. Reproduction, physiological development, dispersal, and survival are influenced by interactions within and between groups and by environmental fluctuations within and across generations. Using multitype branching processes in random environments, we show that invasion fitness is predicted by a stochastic growth rate that can be represented biologically in two meaningful genealogical ways. First, as the long-term geometric mean of the expected per-capita number of mutant copies produced per time step by a representative member of the mutant lineage. Second, as the the long-term geometric mean of the expected reproductive-value-weighted per-capita number of mutant copies produced by such an individual. This latter representation is useful for computing the phenotypic directional derivative of invasion fitness. Moreover, this derivative can be written as an actor-centered inclusive-fitness effect derived from properties of the resident population process. This effect depends on class-specific fitness differentials, relatedness, reproductive values, and class frequencies. However, unless generation- and class-specific fitness defines a stochastic matrix, the derivative does not separate stochastic reproductive values from relatedness and class frequencies, and must be evaluated by simulations. In summary, we formalize invasion fitness biologically quite generally and show how Hamiltons marginal rule is deduced from it.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
2
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.1%
4
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
5
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
6
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.5%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.8%
14
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
17
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
18
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
19
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
20
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%