Back

Enhancing dengue diagnosis and surveillance by integrating machine learning technologies with the NS1 rapid test kit

Hwang, C.-K.; Chen, Y.-W.; WANG, Y.-T.; Ho, T.-S.; Oyang, Y.-J.

2026-05-06 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.05.26352445 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDengue has been a major health threat globally in recent years. In particular, dengue incidences continue to increase annually and the epidemic area has expanded primarily due to global warming. Therefore, effective case detection and surveillance strategies are crucial to tackle this global health challenge. In clinical practice, the rapid test kit detecting dengue non-structural protein 1 antigen and commonly referred as NS1, is widely employed for early diagnosis. However, real-world studies revealed that the sensitivity of the NS1 test kit ranged from approximately 61% to 95%. Since early diagnosis is really critical for disease surveillance in the early stage of a dengue epidemic, scientists have been working hard to develop novel diagnosis methods that can provide higher sensitivity levels. Methodology/Principal FindingsIn response to this challenge, in this study, we have developed a novel diagnosis procedure that integrates machine learning technologies with the NS1 test kit. Our experimental results revealed that we would be able to raise the sensitivity of the dengue diagnosis procedure to higher than 99% by incorporating machine learning based prediction models to screen the suspected patients with a negative NS1 result. Furthermore, the relative risks between the suspected patients who were predicted to be positive and those who were predicted to be negative exceeded 4.8. Conclusions/SignificanceThese results illustrate that the proposed approach provides an effective and efficient diagnosis procedure to address the global health challenge caused by spread of dengue. Author SummaryThis study has aimed to enhance surveillance of the dengue disease by integrating machine learning technologies with the rapid test kit commonly employed in early diagnosis. In clinical practice, the NS1 rapid test kit is widely employed for early diagnosis. However, real-world studies revealed that a certain percentage of the patients with a negative NS1 test result, ranging from 5% to 39%, were actually infected by dengue. Since early diagnosis is critical for disease control in the early stage of a dengue epidemic, scientists have been working hard to tackle this challenge. Based on this observation, this study was launched to investigate the effects of incorporating machine learning based prediction models to further screen those patients with a negative NS1 test result. The experimental results revealed that the proposed approach was able to identify over 99% of the patients who were infected by the dengue disease. Furthermore, the risk of the suspected patients who were predicted to be positive was 4.8 times higher than the risk of those who were predicted to be negative. The experimental results illustrate that the proposed approach provides an effective and efficient diagnosis procedure to enhance surveillance of the dengue disease.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.5%
2
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
6
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
16
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
24
Journal of Medical Entomology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
25
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
28
Journal of Biomedical Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
29
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%