Back

Machine Learning-Driven Multiplexed Biomarker Detection with Polymer-Enhanced Electrochemical Sensors

Duesselberg, A. L. M.; Weber, I. C.; Zosso, Y.; Salah, P.; Bao, Z.

2026-05-07 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.04.722575 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biomarkers in sweat and saliva offer a promising avenue for non-invasive health monitoring. Electrochemical sensors have the potential to measure such biomarkers simultaneously. However, they are limited in discriminating individual biomarkers in mixtures, as redox potentials often overlap, resulting in current signatures that cannot be deconvoluted. This study focuses on differentiating biomarkers using orthogonal sensing materials combined with machine learning. We introduce a flexible electrochemical sensor array comprising carbon flower electrodes modified with poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) or poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) for the detection of estradiol (E2), ascorbic acid (AA), serotonin (5-HT), and melatonin (Mel). The two polymers act by altering the redox potential and current response of each biomarker, thereby enhancing signal diversity and enabling peak separation. Using multi-output regression models on 450 single and mixture measurements, the array accurately predicts concentrations (R2 = 0.95) over a wide dynamic range spanning nanomolar to micromolar levels. Polymer-resolved analysis reveals that PVDF-modifications enhance E2 and Mel detection, while P4VP-modifications improve AA and 5-HT quantification, highlighting the benefit of complementary orthogonal sensing electrodes. This finding is further supported by feature attribution analysis, which shows that the machine learning model relies on polymer-specific electrochemical signatures, directly linking improved performance to distinct polymer-analyte interactions. Overall, these results demonstrate that combining polymer-modified orthogonal electrodes with machine learning enables accurate, multiplexed sensing in complex mixtures, advancing selective detection strategies for future sensor platforms.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.8%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.7%
4
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
6
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.1%
7
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.1%
9
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
10
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
12
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
15
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
17
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
26
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%