Back

Optimizing Screening for Intrauterine Fetal Growth Restriction in Low-Resource Settings Using 2D Ultrasound: A Deep Learning Approach

Enywaku, A.; Asiku, R. A.

2026-05-05 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.04.26352354 medRxiv
Show abstract

Severe fetal growth restriction (sFGR) affects 5 to 10% of pregnancies worldwide and is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Traditional 2D ultrasound detection methods suffer from operator dependency, gestational age uncertainty, and limited access to Doppler in many low-resource facilities. This study presents a deep learning framework for sFGR screening and triage using 2D fetal abdominal ultrasound images designed to operate independently of precise gestational dating. Growth restriction severity labels were derived by mapping abdominal circumference measurements to INTERGROWTH-21st term percentiles as a gestational-age-normalized proxy for fetal size restriction when case-level gestational age or birth-weight data are unavailable. A systematic literature review of 37 studies revealed gaps in severity stratification and generalizability. We implemented a DenseNet-121-based model with abdominal circumference measurement for severity-aware classification using a retrospective single-center dataset of 1588 annotated fetal abdominal images from 169 term pregnancies. Patient-wise 3-fold cross-validation and ensemble testing yielded 93.7% accuracy, a weighted F1-score of 0.76, and ROC AUC [≥] 0.98 per class on heldout data. The approach outperforms previously reported single-center methods on this dataset while explicitly targeting LMIC-specific constraints. It demonstrates potential as a gestational-age-independent first-line triage layer for equitable prenatal screening, subject to prospective multi-site validation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.9%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.3%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
6
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
12
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
18
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
20
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
21
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
24
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
27
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%