Back

Functional Severity Determines Return to Sport After Ankle Sprain in Young Athletes

Sakoda, S.; Kajiwara, K.; Yoshida, A.; Kawano, K.

2026-05-04 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.05.03.26352308 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo determine whether early functional severity at presentation explains variability in return to sport (RTS) after ankle sprain in young athletes, compared with sprain subtype and injury mechanism. DesignRetrospective cohort study. MethodsAthletes aged [&le;]22 years with acute ankle sprains were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Surgically treated cases were excluded. Functional severity at presentation was classified into three grades based on the ability to continue sports participation and ambulate immediately after injury. Injury mechanisms were categorized as high-energy deceleration (HED) or non-HED. RTS was analyzed as time to return and as prolonged RTS ([&ge;]4 weeks). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with prolonged RTS. ResultsA total of 437 cases were included. Median RTS was 2.0 weeks (interquartile range, 0.0-4.0), and prolonged RTS occurred in 33.0% of cases. RTS duration increased stepwise with greater functional severity (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, functional severity was strongly associated with prolonged RTS (Grade 2: adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.07-6.19; Grade 3: adjusted OR, 24.53; 95% CI, 10.67-56.43; p < 0.001), and age was also independently associated (adjusted OR, 1.19 per year; 95% CI, 1.11-1.27; p < 0.001). Sprain subtype and injury mechanism were not independently associated with RTS after adjustment. ConclusionsEarly functional severity at presentation is the primary determinant of RTS after ankle sprain in young athletes. Apparent differences related to sprain subtype and injury mechanism are largely explained by initial functional impairment.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.6%
2
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
4
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
7
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
10
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
11
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
18
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
25
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%