Back

Antenatal Steroid Exposure among Late Preterm Births Following Updated Clinical Guidance

Clapp, M. A.; Lee, D.; Li, S.; James, K. E.; Lorch, S. A.; Cohen, J. L.; Wright, J. D.; Gyamfi-Bannerman, C.; Kaimal, A. J.; Melamed, A.

2026-05-05 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.05.03.26351671 medRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTIONIn 2021, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine updated its guidance on late preterm antenatal steroids, which included a recommendation to engage in shared decision-making on the risks and benefits. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of this updated guidance on the practice among a contemporary cohort of US births. METHODSThis retrospective cohort study implemented an interrupted time series (ITS) design among late preterm singleton births using encounter-level inpatient data from the Premier Healthcare Database (PHD). A 3-year observational period before (January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021) and after (January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024) the intervention date (selected as January 1, 2022) was defined to quantify whether the guideline was associated with changes in obstetric practice. Steroid exposure was modeled at the patient level as a binary outcome using Poisson regression with a log-link function, with a linear spline at the intervention knot to estimate both the pre-intervention slope and the change in slope following guideline dissemination. The change in slope at the knot was the primary parameter of interest. Time was measured in quarters. Incidence rate ratios can be interpreted as quarter percent changes (QPCs) in the rate of ACS use and are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: 342,925 late preterm deliveries were included in the analysis: 176,938 in the pre-period and 165,987 in the post-period. 57,372 (32.4%) in the pre-period were exposed to late preterm steroids, and exposure rates were stable over time (adjusted QPC (aQPC) 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.01). Following guideline dissemination, steroid exposure rates declined by 3% per quarter (aQPC 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.98), indicating a significant change in the trajectory of steroid use among the population targeted by the guideline. In quarter 4 of 2024 (the end of the study period), the exposure rate decreased to 25.1%. CONCLUSIONLate preterm steroid exposure decreased significantly after SMFM updated its clinical guidance, which newly highlighted the conflicting long-term data and recommended shared decision-making about the risks and benefits. Future research on the long-term risks and benefits of ACS is needed to inform clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making. Key PointsFollowing SMFMs 2021 updated guidance on late preterm antenatal corticosteroids, which highlighted uncertain long-term neurodevelopmental risks and recommended individualized counseling, steroid exposure among late preterm births declined by approximately 3% per quarter in a nationally representative US cohort.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
5
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
8
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
14
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
17
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
24
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%