Back

Multispecific nanobody degraders co-deplete membrane receptors and enable targeted delivery of diverse payloads

Kabir, M.; Kim, J.; Deng, Z.; Xiang, Y.; Sargunas, P.; Song, N.; Wang, Z.; Param, N.; Jin, C.; Sang, Z.; Yue, A.; Bundo, A.; Hossain, R.; Zhong, Y.; Lin, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Guccione, E.; Huang, K.-l.; Feng, M.; Jin, J.; Shi, Y.

2026-05-06 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.02.722401 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeting membrane receptors underlies the success of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), yet single-receptor formats can be limited by heterogeneous expression, compensatory signaling, and variable internalization. Here we developed Multivalent Interchangeable Nanobody Degradation System (MINDS), a modular nanobody-Fc chassis that co-engages multiple membrane receptors, promotes their lysosomal co-depletion, and enables delivery of diverse intracellular payloads. As a proof of concept, we generated Tritazumab, a trispecific nanobody-Fc targeting three oncogenic receptors EGFR, cMET, and TfR1. Tritazumab incorporates a high-affinity, non-transferrin-competing anti-TfR1 nanobody that drives efficient uptake and lysosomal trafficking, enabling coordinated depletion of all three receptors. Across non-small cell lung cancer models, Tritazumab achieved rapid and sustained multi-receptor surface loss with picomolar degradation potency, reaching near-maximal depletion within approximately 1.5 hours. Conjugation of Tritazumab to MMAE preserved receptor binding and produced substantially greater antiproliferative activity and improved tumor selectivity relative to clinical ADCs in matched cell models, along with potent in vivo tumor growth inhibition and acceptable tolerability in a xenograft model. Extending the platform beyond cytotoxic payloads, a BRD4 molecular glue conjugate improved the selectivity window by > 100-fold and showed marked in vivo efficacy, while an EZH2-targeting PROTAC conjugate achieved an approximately 1,000-fold increase in intracellular degradation potency relative to the free PROTAC. These findings establish MINDS as a modular multispecific degrader-payload platform that integrates receptor co-depletion to enhance anticancer selectivity and efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 11%
14.2%
2
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
4
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
5
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
7
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.0%
11
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
12
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.6%
19
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.1%
23
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
26
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
30
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%