Back

Study protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial evaluating recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor B (rhPDGF) in the reconstruction of complex head or neck defects following skin cancer excision

Lempicki, M.; Clark, C. R.; Blette, B. S.; Guzman, R. A. T.; Karamitros, G.; Gergoudis, F.; Gutama, B. W.; ONeill, D. R.; Savitz, B.; Smith, J.; Shirey-Rice, J. K.; Pulley, J. M.; Lynch, S. E.; McGonigle, T. W.; Thayer, W. P.

2026-05-04 surgery
10.64898/2026.05.01.26352276 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPhenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) can reveal novel associations between variants in drug-target genes and disease and, as such, can be used to predict new drug-indication pairs for repurposing drugs with a known mechanism of action. A platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFR{beta}) PheWAS demonstrated that patients with a single nucleotide variant that reduces PDGFR{beta} expression exhibit a higher prevalence of chronic skin ulcers, skin grafts, and reconstructive surgeries. Recombinant human platelet derived growth factor BB (rhPDGF) is a therapeutic that binds to and activates PDGFR{beta} and has received FDA approval for multiple indications, including improving healing of lower extremity diabetic neuropathic ulcers, augmenting periodontal bone and soft tissue reconstruction, and stimulating orthopedic bone regeneration. Leveraging a drug-repurposing methodology informed by PheWAS, we hypothesize that rhPDGF will provide therapeutic benefit in the treatment of other complex wounds, like full-thickness surgical wounds of the head or neck that cannot heal by primary intention following skin cancer excision. MethodsThis prospective, double-blinded, single-site study aims to enroll 40 participants, randomized at a ratio of 1:1, comparing the efficacy of an advanced wound matrix saturated with rhPDGF or saline. Comparisons will be stratified by anatomical location (scalp/forehead versus face/neck) and maximum surgical defect dimensions (< 3cm versus > 3cm). The primary outcome of this study will evaluate the time in days to 81-100% granulation of the wound bed by expert clinical assessment of daily photographs. Secondary outcomes will assess the superiority of the rhPDGF-enhanced wound matrix relative to control with respect to wound granulation rate, epithelialization, complete wound healing, and patient reported outcomes (PROMs). DiscussionAlthough reconstructive techniques are available for healing complex head and neck wounds following skin cancer excision, these procedures are invasive, and older, frail patients are often suboptimal candidates. There remains a need for less invasive therapeutic approaches that reduce the healing time and mitigate the morbidity associated with chronic wounds. A PheWAS analysis identified complex wounds requiring reconstructive surgery as a novel drug-indication pair for repurposing rhPDGF. This protocol is designed to evaluate the efficacy of an rhPDGF-enhanced advanced wound matrix for healing complex head and neck wounds post skin cancer excision that cannot heal by primary intention. Clinical trial registrationThis trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06634030).

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
19
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
24
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%