Back

Disease Burden and Direct Health-Care Spending on Brain Conditions in Switzerland: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease 2023 Study for the Implementation of the Swiss Brain Health Plan

Begue, I.; Sinanaj, L.; Steele, X.; Guzman, R.; Crivelli, L.; Datta, A. N.; Bassetti, C. L. A.

2026-05-03 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.01.26352201 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBrain disorders are leading contributors to increasing disability and spending worldwide. In 2022 the Swiss Brain Health Plan (SBHP) was launched to promote brain health and prevent brain disorders. To guide the implementation of the SBHP, we performed a detailed analysis of the health and economic burden of brain disorders in Switzerland. MethodsWe analyzed Global Burden of Disease 2023 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) cause-specific health-care spending estimates for Switzerland. DALYs were quantified for 1990 - 2023. Spending was analyzed for 2000 - 2019 across six types of care. We examined age and sex patterns, spending distribution, and international comparisons with six other countries (Germany, France, Denmark, Norway, Italy, Singapore). To assess short- and longer-term association between burden and spending estimates, we fitted panel regression models with disorder and year fixed effects under one-year and five-year lag specifications. FindingsBoth disease burden and spending were highly concentrated in a small number of conditions in Switzerland. In 2023, ten brain disorders accounted for 82{middle dot}9% of Switzerlands total DALY burden. In 2019, ten brain disorders accounted for 86{middle dot}0% of all direct brain-health spending, with dementia alone comprising 29{middle dot}5% of total expenditures. Among seven analyzed comparator countries, Switzerland had the highest per-capita brain-health spending and the highest spending per DALY. In fixed-effects panel models that accounted for spending persistence, lagged DALYs were not statistically associated with subsequent spending. Suicide prevention and addiction showed significant lower-than-expected health-sector spending (self-harm: {beta} = -0{middle dot}23; drug use disorders: {beta} = -0{middle dot}08 to -0{middle dot}18 across lag models). InterpretationBrain disorders generate a large burden in Switzerland. Within the IHME estimates, the burden-spending relationship over time appears limited. The implementation of the SBHP will refer to the current data and call for a burden-informed financing to guide strategic cross-sectorial allocation and prevention investments. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe drew on evidence from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2023 estimates on neurological and mental health conditions, and on cause-specific health-care spending data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation for Switzerland and selected high-income countries. These sources show that brain disorders are major contributors to disability and premature mortality, and that Switzerland is among the worlds highest spenders per capita on health care. Prior work has described the costs of individual brain disorders and drivers of health expenditure growth; however, it has often treated burden and spending as partly separate domains, leaving the country-level link between cause-specific disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and cause-specific spending, over time and in either direction, poorly characterized. Added value of this studyTo our knowledge, this is the first study in a single country to systematically link cause-specific DALYs and cause-specific direct health-care spending for brain disorders and to examine their longitudinal and bi-directional associations. Using harmonized GBD 2023 estimates and IHME 2019 cause-specific health spending data, we quantify the health and economic burden of 23 brain disorders in Switzerland across age, sex, care setting, and time, and benchmark patterns against six other high-income countries. By applying panel regression models with disorder and year fixed effects, we assess whether modeled spending shows any association with prior modeled burden once spending persistence is accounted for, and identify conditions with higher or lower spending relative to burden. Implications of all the available evidenceSwitzerland bears a major burden of brain disorders and devotes substantial resources to their care, yet within the modeled estimates, spending does not consistently correspond to burden over time. Disorders with long-standing multisectoral programs tended to show lower spending-to-burden ratios, suggesting that coordinated action beyond the health sector may reduce downstream health-sector demand. For Switzerland and similar health systems, these findings support national brain-health strategies that strengthen life-course prevention and early intervention, and that integrate financing with burden data to inform priority setting and periodic reassessment of resource allocation.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
2
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
4
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
12
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
17
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
20
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
27
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%